Silviculture and management of Scots pine in Sweden
Abstract
This paper gives some information about silvicultural trends in Sweden with the main focus on management of Scots pine stands and measures proposed to enhance biodiversity. During the last decades there has been a shift away from volume production orientated forestry towards forestry focusing on both production and environment with a special emphasis on biodiversity. Our current Forestry Act has two equal goals, (i) forest production and (ii) environment with sustained biodiversity. The major Swedish forest companies and other forest owners are signing agreements in order to meet certification requirements and show that their forest management considers the sustainability of the whole forest ecosystem and the environment of surrounding ecosystems. Even though Scots pine will still mainly be managed on a clear-cutting system, these developments will change Swedish Scots pine forests from even aged, uniform monocultures towards more mixed species and multi-storied stands. Prescribed burning will be practised on Scots pine sites as a site preparation measure that also enhances biodiversity. In this way silviculture will mimic the major natural disturbance agent in boreal Sweden – forest fire. Measures to enhance biodiversity are based on the best available knowledge, but the effect of these measures on biodiversity and forest production is largely unknown. Another uncertainty is how these new stands should be managed in an efficient way.Downloads
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.