The role of Ulmus laevis in German floodplain landscapes
Abstract
In the past, the spread of modern civilisation has heavily reduced the occurrence of natural woodlands in floodplain landscapes and the numbers of elms have also been reduced on a large scale. At the time of the outbreak of Dutch elm disease (DED), the elm populations may have already been reduced by an estimated 90%. At that time, Ulmus minor was the most common elm species in the riparian forests of lowland Central Europe. Eighty years later, the numbers of U. minor had decreased significantly. Data from three rivers in Saxony, Germany suggest that a further 90% of the trees have succumbed to DED. The survivors have mostly been reduced to shrubs and small trees. Ulmus laevis has taken over the role of the typical and well established elm species in floodplain landscapes. Being less susceptible to DED, the trees dominate parts of floodplain meadow landscapes and riparian forests. However, the overall number is low when compared with other tree species. Most U. laevis trees find only restricted habitats within agricultural landscapes and in many cases the elm itself is the only reminder of the existence of a former riparian wildwood. Also, some individuals show a high degree of crown transparency without having been infected with DED. If elms are to constitute an important part of the floodplain tree flora in the future, it is crucial to protect and enhance the existing U. laevis populations. Controlled provenances can help in the process of re-establishing floodplain forests.Downloads
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.