Forest canopy gaps offer a window into the future:The case of subtropical coastal forests within an urban matrix in South Africa
Abstract
Aim of the study: Alien and indigenous species emergence patterns within canopy gaps in urban subtropical forests are poorly understood. This study compared canopy gap floristics in relation to abiotic and physical characteristics across three subtropical urban forests differing in disturbance history.
Area of study: Three Northern Coastal Forests of varying disturbance histories located in coastal subtropical urban KwaZulu-Natal (KZN), South Africa (SA).
Materials and methods: Closed canopy (n = 15 quadrats per forest ) and four gaps (n = 12 quadrats per forest) from three size classes (‘small’ < 25 m2, ‘medium’ 25 - 45 m2; ‘large’ > 45 m2) were surveyed for the primary least disturbed (PLD), primary highly disturbed (PHD) and transitional highly disturbed (THD) forests using classical vegetation sampling techniques. Soil moisture content and air temperature were measured within each gap.
Main results: Cumulatively all forest gaps hosted 198 species. Equivalent number of species (Hill numbers from H = 0 to H = 2) were constantly higher in the PHD forest followed by the PLD forest and lowest in the THD forest. Alien and indigenous plant density were negatively correlated. Species richness was positively correlated with gap size and soil moisture content, and negatively correlated with air temperature.
Research highlights: Gap floristic patterns are influenced by size, abiotic factors, disturbance and forest successional status. Floristic, abiotic and physical characteristics of gaps should be monitored within urban forests as these can influence gap infilling in terms of rate, species composition, and alien-indigenous plant interactions across the forest. This can inform management interventions such as species reintroduction and alien clearing.
Keywords: conservation; disturbance; gaps; management; Northern Coastal Forest; subtropical; species richness.
Abbreviations: SA: South Africa; KZN: KwaZulu-Natal; PLD: Primary Least Disturbed forest; PHD: Primary Highly Disturbed forest; THD: Transitional Highly Disturbed forest; IOCB: Indian Ocean Coastal Belt; New POSA: New Plants of southern Africa website; NEMBA: National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act.
Downloads
References
Abe S, Masaki T, Nakashizuka T. 1995. Factors influencing sapling composition in canopy gaps of a temperate deciduous forest. Vegetatio 120: 21-31.
Ahrends A, Burgess ND, Milledge SA, Bulling MT, Fisher B, Smart JC, Clarke GP, Mhoro BE, Lewis SL. 2010. Predictable waves of sequential forest degradation and biodiversity loss spreading from an African city. PNAS 107: 14556-14561. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914471107
Alston KP, Richardson, DM. 2006. The roles of habitat features, disturbance, and distance from putative source populations in structuring alien plant invasions at the urban/wildland interface on the Cape Peninsula, South Africa. Biol Cons 132: 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.03.023
Angiosperm Phylogeny Website (APW). 2020. Viewed 31 August 2019, from http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/
Asner GP, Kellner JR, Kennedy-Bowdoin T, Knapp D.E., Anderson C, Martin RE. 2013. Forest canopy gap distributions in the southern Peruvian Amazon. PloS One 8: p.e60875. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060875
Bhugeloo A, Peerbhay K, Ramdhani S, Sershen. 2019. Tracking indigenous forest cover within an urban matrix through land use analysis: The case of a rapidly developing African city. RSASE 13: 328-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2018.12.003
Boon R. 2010. Pooley's trees of eastern South Africa, Flora and Fauna Publications Trust, Durban, South Africa.
Brokaw N, Busing RT. 2000. Niche versus chance and tree diversity in forest gaps. Tree, 15: 183-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01822-X
Brokaw NVL. 1985. Gap-phase regeneration in a tropical forest. Ecology 66: 682-687. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940529
Brothers TS, Spingarn A. 1992. Forest fragmentation and alien plant invasion of central Indiana old-growth forests. Cons Biol 6: 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610091.x
Chao A, Gotelli NJ, Hsieh TC, Sander EL, Ma KH, Colwell RK, Ellison AM. 2014. Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol Monogr 84: 45-67. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0133.1
Chen L, Han W, Liu D, Liu G. 2019. How forest gaps shaped plant diversity along an elevational gradient in Wolong National Nature Reserve? J Geogr Sci 29: 1081-1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-019-1646-6
Clarke KR. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18: 117-143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.x
Clinton BD. 2003. Light, temperature, and soil moisture responses to elevation, evergreen understory, and small canopy gaps in the southern Appalachians. For Ecol Manag 186: 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00277-9
Coates KD. 2000. Conifer seedling response to northern temperate forest gaps. For Ecol Manag 127: 249-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00135-8
Colwell RK. 2013. EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples, version 9.1. 0. User's guide and application. University of Connecticut, USA.
Connor EF, McCoy ED. 1979. The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship. Am Nat 113: 791-833. https://doi.org/10.1086/283438
D'Antonio C, Meyerson LA. 2002. Exotic plant species as problems and solutions in ecological restoration: A synthesis. Restor Ecol 10: 703-713. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2002.01051.x
Department of Environmental Affairs (South African). 2004. National Environmental Management: 6 Biodiversity Act (Act 10 of 2004). Government Gazette 24636 (467).
Department of Environmental Affairs (South African). 2016. National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (10/2004): Alien and Invasive Species List, 2016, Government notice #864, Government Gazette 40166.
Devagiri GM, Khaple AK, Mohan S, Venkateshamurthy P, Tomar S, Arunkumar AN, Joshi G. 2016. Species diversity, regeneration and dominance as influenced by canopy gaps and their characteristics in tropical evergreen forests of Western Ghats, India. J For Res 27: 799-810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-016-0223-4
Everham EM III, Myster RW, VanDeGenachte E. 1996. Effects of light, moisture, temperature, and litter on the regeneration of five tree species in the tropical montane wet forest of Puerto Rico. Am J Bot 83: 1063-1068. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb12804.x
Feldmann E, Drößler L, Hauck M, Kucbel S, Pichler V, Leuschner C. 2018. Canopy gap dynamics and tree understory release in a virgin beech forest, Slovakian Carpathians. For Ecol Manag 415: 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.02.022
Gioria M, Pyšek P, 2015. The legacy of plant invasions: Changes in the soil seed bank of invaded plant communities. BioScience, 66 :40-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv165
Grainger MJ, van Aarde RJ. 2013. The role of canopy gaps in the regeneration of coastal dune forest. Afr J Ecol 51: 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.2012.01348.x
Gravel D, Canham CD, Beaudet M, Messier C. 2010. Shade tolerance, canopy gaps and mechanisms of coexistence of forest trees. Oikos 119: 475-484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17441.x
Gray AN, Spies TA, Easter MJ. 2002. Microclimatic and soil moisture responses to gap formation in coastal Douglas-fir forests. Can J For Res 32: 332-343. https://doi.org/10.1139/x01-200
Grubb PJ, Bellingham PJ, Kohyama TS, Piper FI, Valido A. 2013. Disturbance regimes, gap-demanding trees and seed mass related to tree height in warm temperate rain forests worldwide. Biol Rev 88: 701-744. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12029
Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4: 9.
Hawkins C, Suss C. 2011. December. Application of NASA observational data and habitat suitability modeling to Wavyleaf Basketgrass (Oplismenus hirtellus). In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, pp. B33B-0464.
Hill JL, Curran PJ. 2003. Area, shape and isolation of tropical forest fragments: effects on tree species diversity and implications for conservation. J Biogeogr 30: 1391-1403. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00930.x
Huston MA. 2004. Management strategies for plant invasions: manipulating productivity, disturbance, and competition. Divers Distrib 10: 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00083.x
Jiang Y, Zang R, Letcher SG, Ding Y, Huang Y, Lu X, Huang J, Liu W, Zhang Z. 2016. Associations between plant composition/diversity and the abiotic environment across six vegetation types in a biodiversity hotspot of Hainan Island, China. Plant Soil 403: 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2723-y
Kambaj OK, Sershen, Govender Y, Ramdhani, S. 2018. A floristic comparison of three Northern Coastal Forests differing in disturbance history. Bothalia 48, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4102/abc.v48i1.2262
Karki L, Hallgren SW. 2015. Tree-fall gaps and regeneration in old-growth cross timbers forests. Nat Areas J 35: 533-541. https://doi.org/10.3375/043.035.0405
Kruskal JB. 1964. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29: 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289694
Lu D, Wang GG, Yu L, Zhang T, Zhu J. 2018. Seedling survival within forest gaps: the effects of gap size, within-gap position and forest type on species of contrasting shade-tolerance in Northeast China. For: Int J For Res 91: 470-479. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpy007
Lu D, Zhang G, Zhu J, Wang GG, Zhu C, Yan Q, Zhang J, 2019. Early natural regeneration patterns of woody species within gaps in a temperate secondary forest. Eur J For Res 138: 991-1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-019-01219-w
Maranho ÁS, Salimon CI, Costa DS, 2016. Woody flora of natural forest gaps in a bamboo-dominated forest remnant in southwestern Amazonia. Check List. https://doi.org/10.15560/12.3.1891
Massad TJ, Williams GL, Wilson M, Hulsey CE, Deery E, Bridges LE. 2019. Regeneration dynamics in old-growth urban forest gaps. Urban For & Urban Green 43: 126364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.06.007
Mather AS. 1992. The Forest Transition. Area 24: 367-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4485(92)90063-G
Matlack GR, Good RE. 1990. Spatial heterogeneity in the soil seed bank of a mature coastal plain forest. Bull Torrey Bot Club 117: 143-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2997053
McCarthy JW, 2001. Gap dynamics of forest trees: A review with particular attention to boreal forests. Environ Rev 9: 1-59. https://doi.org/10.1139/a00-012
Mucina L, Scott-Shaw CR, Rutherford MC, Camp KG, Matthews WS, Powrie LW, Hoare DB, 2006. Indian Ocean coastal belt. In: L. Mucina, M.C. Rutherford, eds. The Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Pretoria: Strelitzia 19, South African National Biodiversity Institute, pp. 568-583.
Murphy HT, Westcott DA, Metcalfe DJ, 2006. Functional diversity of native and invasive plant species in tropical rainforests. Vine: 79.
Muscolo A, Bagnato S, Sidari M, Mercurio R, 2014. A review of the roles of forest canopy gaps. J For Res 25: 725-736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-014-0521-7
Nagel TA, Svoboda M, Rugani T, Diaci J. 2010. Gap regeneration and replacement patterns in an old-growth Fagus-Abies forest of Bosnia-Herzegovina. Plant Ecol 208: 307-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-009-9707-z
Obiri JA, Lawes MJ. 2004. Chance versus determinism in canopy gap regeneration in coastal scarp forest in South Africa. J Veg Sci 15: 539-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02293.x
Rodriguez LF. 2006. Can invasive species facilitate native species? Evidence of how, when, and why these impacts occur. Biol Invasions, 8 : 927-939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-5103-3
RStudio Team (2019). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA. http://www.rstudio.com/
Runkle JR. 1981. Gap regeneration in some old‐growth forests of the eastern United States. Ecology 62: 1041-1051. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937003
Runkle JR. 1992. Guidelines and sample protocol for sampling forest gaps. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-283. Portland, OR: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 283. https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-GTR-283
Sershen, Drury CC, Carbutt C, Ramdhani S. 2019. Seed banks of subtropical grassland patches within an urban matrix in South Africa: reflecting the past and foretelling the future. Botany 97: 231-244. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2018-0155
Sharma LN, Grytnes J, Måren IE, Vetaas OR. 2016. Do composition and richness of woody plants vary between gaps and closed canopy patches in subtropical forests? J Veg Sci 27: 1129-1139. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12445
Sharma LN, Shrestha KB, Måren IE. 2018. Tree regeneration in gap-understory mosaics in a subtropical Shorea robusta (Sal) forest. J For Res 30: 2061-2068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-018-0747-x
Solecki W, Rosenzweig C, Dhakal S, Roberts D, Barau AS, Schultz S, Ürge-Vorsatz D. 2018. City transformations in a 1.5 °C warmer world. Nat Clim Change 8: 177. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0101-5
South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI). 2020a. New Plants of southern Africa: southern African plant names and floristic details, viewed 31 March 2020, from http://posa.sanbi.org/
South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI). 2020b. Red list of South African plants, viewed 31 March, 2020, from http://redlist.sanbi.org/
Vargas R, Cuevas JG, Le Quesne C, Reif A, Bannister J. 2010. Spatial distribution and regeneration strategies of the main forest species on Robinson Crusoe Island. Rev Chil Hist Nat 83: 349-363. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-078X2010000300003
Whitmore TC. 1989. Canopy gaps and the two major groups of forest trees. Ecology 70: 536-538. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940195
Wittkuhn RS. 2010. Wind-aided seed dispersal of perennial veld grass (Ehrharta calycina): Implications for restoration in weedy urban bushland remnants. Ecol Manag Restor 11: 148-150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-8903.2010.00536.x
Yamamoto SI. 2000. Forest gap dynamics and tree regeneration. J For Res 5: 223-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02767114
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
