The usefulness of Decision Support Systems in participatory forest planning: a comparison between Finland and Italy

  • I. De Meo Consiglio per la Ricerca e la sperimentazione in Agricoltura - Agrobiology and Pedology Centre (CRA-ABP). Firenze.
  • F. Ferretti Consiglio per la Ricerca e la sperimentazione in Agricoltura – Apennines Forestry Research Unit (CRA-SFA. Isernia.
  • T. Hujala Finnish Forest Research Institute - Vantaa Unit. Vantaa.
  • A. Kangas University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Sciences. Helsinki.


Aim of study: Participation of stakeholders is considered an essential element in producing, at different spatial and temporal scales, forest plans accepted by local community and fulfilling the requirements of Sustainable Forest Management. Increasingly, computer-based decision support systems (DSS) and tools are being introduced to assist stakeholders and decision-makers in coping with the complexities inherent in participatory forest planning. The study aimed to investigate how useful the users and researchers see DSS tools and which opportunities they perceive DSS might carry for enhancing participatory forest planning in their field of activity.

Area of study: 15 Italian and Finnish researchers and practitioners were interviewed.

Material and Methods:  Face-to-face structured interviews were used to collect opinions and experiences. Quantitative and qualitative information were analyzed to investigate differences between Italian and Finnish respondents as well as between researchers and practitioners

Main results: Results showed that in Italy there has been more focus on forest-level and medium-term problems and the intelligence phase, while in Finland there has been more attention to region-level and long-term problems and equally intelligence, design, and choice phases of decision-making. Deviations probably reflect different planning contexts and culture, variability in experiences and expertise in DSS and in availability of suitable DSS.

Research highlights: The study suggests to pay attention to evaluating the success criteria of participatory planning when preparing for the use of DSS and related tools in practical forest planning processes. Experience sharing is a key to reaching more successful use of DSS.

Keywords: computer-based decision support; participatory processes; spatial scale; success criteria; temporal scale; users' perception.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

I. De Meo, Consiglio per la Ricerca e la sperimentazione in Agricoltura - Agrobiology and Pedology Centre (CRA-ABP). Firenze.
Agrobiology and Pedology Centre (ABP)


Ananda J, Herath G. 2009. A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning. Ecol Econ 68: 2235-2248.

Buchy M, Hoverman S. 2000. Understanding public participation in forest planning: a review, Forest Policy Econ 1: 15-25.

Diaz-Balteiro L, Romero C. 2008. Making forestry decisions with multiple criteria: A review and an assessment. Forest Ecol Manag 255: 3222-3241.

Ferretti F, Dibari C, De Meo I, Cantiani P, Bianchi M. 2011. ProgettoBosco, a Data-Driven Decision Support System for forest planning. Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural-Resource Sciences (MCFNS), 3 (1): 27-35.

Fürst C, Volk M, Pietzsch K, Makeschin F. 2010. Pimp Your Landscape: A Tool for Qualitative Evaluation of the Effects of Regional Planning Measures on Ecosystem Services. Environmental Management 6: 953–968. PMid:20924579

Hiltunen V, Kurttila M, Leskinen P, Pasanen K, Pykäläinen J. 2009. Mesta: An internet-based decision-support application for participatory strategic-level natural resources planning. Forest Policy Econ 11: 1-9.

Kangas A, Kangas J, Kurttila M. 2008. Decision Support for Forest Management. Springer science p. 222.

Kangas A, Laukkanen S, Kangas J. 2006. Social choice theory and its applications in sustainable forest management—a review. Forest Policy Econ 9: 77– 92.

Laamanen R, Kangas A. 2011. Large-scale forest owner's information needs in operational planning of timber harvesting – some practical views in Metsähallitus, Finnish state-owned enterprise. Silva Fenn 45: 711–727.

Lindner M, Werhahn-Mees W, Suominen T, Vötter D, Zudin S, et al. 2012. Conducting sustainability impact assessments of forestry-wood chains: examples of ToSIA applications. Eur J Forest Res 131: 21-34.

Mendoza GA, Prabhu R. 2006. Participatory modeling and analysis for sustainable forest management: Overview of soft system dynamics models and applications. Forest Policy Econ 9: 179– 196.

Menzel S, Nordström E-M, Buchecker M, Marques A, Saarikoski H, Kangas A. 2012. Between ethics and technology - evaluation criteria for the development of appropriate DSS in the context of participatory planning. Eur J Forest Res. Online First™, 13 February 2012.

Mustajoki J, Saarikoski H, Marttunen M, Ahtikoski A, Hallikainen V, Helle T, Hyppönen M, Jokinen M, Naskali A, Tuulentie S, Varmola M, Vatanen E, Ylisirniö AL. 2011. Use of decision analysis interviews to support the sustainable use of the forests in Finnish Upper Lapland. Journal of Environmental Management 92: 1550-1563. PMid:21288630

Nordström EM, Eriksson LO, Öhman K. 2010. Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: Experience from a case study in northern Sweden. Forest Policy Econ 12: 562–574.

Nordström EM, Eriksson LO, Öhman K. 2011. Multiple criteria decision analysis with consideration to place-specific values in participatory forest planning. Silva Fenn 45: 253–265.

Paletto A, Ferretti F, De Meo I. 2012. The Role of Social Networks in Forest Landscape Planning. Forest Policy Econ 15: 132–139.

Pykäläinen J, Pukkala T, Kangas J, 2001. Alternative priority models for forest planning on the landscape level involving multiple ownership. Forest Policy Econ 2: 293-306.

Pykäläinen J, Hiltunen V, Leskinen P. 2007. Complementary use of voting methods and interactive utility analysis in participatory strategic forest planning: Experiences gained from western Finland. Can J Forest Res 37: 853–865.

Redsven V, Hirvelä H, Härkönen K, Salminen O, Siitonen M. 2011. MELA2009 Reference Manual (2nd edition). The Finnish Forest Research Institute. 664 pp.

Simon HA, 1960. The New Science of Management Decision. Harper & Row, New York, USA.

Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. 1998. Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 1st ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

How to Cite
De Meo, I., Ferretti, F., Hujala, T., & Kangas, A. (2013). The usefulness of Decision Support Systems in participatory forest planning: a comparison between Finland and Italy. Forest Systems, 22(2), 304-319.