Productivity and nutrient accumulation of two native tree species in eastern Colombian tropical Andes
Abstract
Aim of study: To compare the productivity, nutrient content and carbon stock with the reforestation of native trees Cordia gerascanthus and Cariniana pyriformis in an agricultural area abandoned. In Colombia, these species are commonly known as móncoro and abarco, respectively.
Area of study: Pure forest of native species planted in the Andean region of Colombia with a typical tropical rainforest climate and naturally low-fertility soils.
Material and methods: After eight years of planting, the stem volume was evaluated in 27 trees per species using the Smalian formula. These data were used to develop allometric equations for stem volume. To estimate the nutrient and carbon content of the stem, a representative tree of each species was felled, and soil samples were collected up to 40 cm deep.
Main results: The two species showed similar survival, basal area and stem carbon stock, but for abarco the stem volume (62.0 m3 ha-1) and stem biomass (35.2 Mg ha-1) were two and 0.4 times higher (p < 0.05), respectively The zinc (41%), copper (128%), and Mg (+400) contents accumulated significantly more (p < 0.05) in the stem of móncoro. The nonlinear models of Spurr (R2= 0.94) and Schumacher-Hall (R2= 0.93) showed the highest accuracy for estimating volume. In the soil, the carbon content of both species averaged 69.3 Mg ha-1 (p > 0.05).
Research highlights: The abarco shows higher commercial productivity than the móncoro. These results provide a baseline for understanding growth performance, but further studies involving reference sites or control plots are needed to evaluate the overall results of reforestation.
Downloads
References
Abimelec N, Duarte M, Bautista J, 2009. Plan de ordenamiento y manejo de la subcuenca río Salamaga, municipios de Matanza, El Playón y Rionegro – Santander, Colombia. CDMB, Bucaramanga, Colombia. 160 pp.
Amezquita SP, Rubiano J, Barros Filho N, Cipriani H, 2018. Fertilization effects on Eucalyptus pellita F. Muell productivity in the Colombian Orinoco region. Árvore 42(5): e420502. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-90882018000500002
Andrade HJ, Segura MA, Suárez J, 2023. Growth and carbon sequestration in biomass of Cordia alliodora in Andean agroforestry systems with coffee. Agroforest Syst 97: 1435–1446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00868-6
Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas – ABNT, 2003. NBR 14929. Determinação da umidade da madeira. ABNT, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. 6 pp.
Aryal KR, Chapagain TR, Basukala RK, Khadka S, Chaudhary G, Budha R, Adhikari H, Khatri DJ, Aryal U, Sharma RP, 2023. Allometric tree volume models for Pinus roxberghii and Cedrus deodara in Karnali Province, Nepal. For Ecol Manag 546: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121364
Barrios-Trilleras A, López-Aguirre AM, 2024. Aboveground biomass models for Acacia mangium Willd. growing at the eastern plains of Colombia. FLORAM 31(4): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087-FLORAM-2023-2021
Bertoncello R, Oliveira AA, Holl K, Pansonato M, Martini A, 2016. Cluster planting facilitates survival but not growth in early development of restored tropical forest. Basic Appl Ecol 17(6): 489–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2016.04.006
Blanco J, 2020. Caracterización de las 30 especies forestales maderables más movilizadas en Colombia provenientes del bosque natural. FAO, MiniAmbiente & Unión Europea. Bogotá, Colombia. 83 pp.
Carvajal M, Murguetio E, Calle Z, 2022. Silvopastoral systems and ecological connectivity in a grazing landscape of the Magdalena Medio region, Colombia. Rev Agroecossistemas 14(2): 134–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.18542/ragros.v14i2.13604
Carvalho F, Escobar-Pachajoa L, Camargo I, Rojas-Molina J, Jaimes-Suárez Y, Rivera-Meneses J, 2023. The interspecific interactions in agroforestry systems enhance leaf water use efficiency and carbon storage in cocoa. Environ Exp Bot 205: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.105119
Comer PJ, Valdez J, Pereira HM, Acosta-Muñoz C, Campos F, Bonet FJ, Claros X, Castro L, Dallmeier F, Rivadeneira EY, et al., 2022. Conserving ecosystem diversity in the Tropical. Remote Sens 14(12): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122847
Cuong L, Hung B, Bolanle-Ojo OT, Xu X, Thanh N, Chai L, Legesse N, Wang J, Thang B, 2020. Biomass and carbon storage in an age-sequence of Acacia mangium plantation forests in Southeastern region, Vietnam. For Syst 29(2), e009: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122847
Dantas D, Terra M, Pinto L, Calegario N, Maciel S, 2021. Above and belowground carbon stock in a tropical forest in Brazil. Acta Sci Agron 43(e48276): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v43i1.48276
Dick G, Schumacher M, Momolli D, Souza H, Guimarães C, Ludvichak A, 2017. Micronutrients and biomass in Eucalyptus dunnii Maiden stand. Árvore 41(1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-90882017000100013
Ehrenbergerová L, Cienciala E, Kucera A, Guy L, Habrová A, 2016. Carbon stock in agroforestry coffee plantations with different shade trees in Villa Rica, Peru. Agroforest System 90: 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9865-z
Espitia M, Araméndiz H, Cardona C, 2017. Características morfométricas, anatómicas y viabilidad de semillas de Cedrela odorata L. y Cariniana pyriformis Miers. Agron. Mesoam. 28(3): 605–617. https://doi.org/10.15517/ma.v28i3.26287
Galindo-Rodriguez C, Roa-Fuentes L, 2017. Seed desiccation tolerance and dispersal in tropical dry forests in Colombia: Implications for ecological restoration. For Ecol Manag 404: 289–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.08.042
Giri K, Chandra G, Jayaraj RS, Borah RK, Kardong P, Borah S, Goswami A, 2021. Regression models for estimating stem volume of Aquilaria malaccensis (Lam.) in North East India. Environ Chall 5(100279): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100279
Gomes V, Barreto-Garcia P, Novaes A, Scoriza R, Nascimento M, Oliveira M, 2019. Biomass and nutrients removal in pure and mixed populations of Pinus sp. in southwest Bahia – Brazil. Floresta 49(3): 571–578. https://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v49i3.60531
González-González A, Clerici N, Quesada B, 2021. Growing mining contribution to Colombian deforestation. Environ Res Lett 6(6): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abfcf8
Hüller A, Coelho G, Meneghello G, Peske S, 2017. Evaluation of direct seeding and seedling planting of two Neotropical tree species with the use of natural inputs. Árvore 41(4): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-90882017000400005
ICONTEC, 2011. NTC 5167: Productos orgánicos usados como abonos o fertilizantes y enmiendas o acondicionadores de suelo. ICONTEC, Bogotá, Colombia. 54 p.
IDEAM, 2025. Consulta y Descarga de Datos Hidrometeorológicos. https://dhime.ideam.gov.co/atencionciudadano/
IGAC, 2003. Estudio general de suelos y zonificación de tierras. Departamento de Santander. IGAC, Bogotá, Colombia. 52 pp.
IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. https://www.iucnredlist.org
Lombo D, Burbano E, Arias JA, Rivera M, 2023. Carbon storage in tree biomass dispersed in pastures in the arid Caribbean region of Colombia. For Syst 32(1), e002: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2023321-18932
Lozano-Báez SE, Boeni AF, Valderrama P, Rodrigues RR, 2024. Attention needed in forest carbon projects: An analysis of initiatives in Colombia. For Ecol Manag 574(122354): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122354
MADR, 2023. Boletín de Información Forestal, marzo 2023. Cifra de deforestación nacional. Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural, Bogotá, Colombia. 82 pp.
MAFE, 2007. Tree volume tables and equations. In: Forest mensuration. Managing forest ecosystems; Van Laar A, Akça A (eds). pp. 163–181. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Martínez CE, Orrego S, Giraldo SA, del Valle JI, Hernández-Barajas F, David D, 2025. Autocorrelation as a critical factor of growth depensation of tropical trees in the Chocó biogeographic region. Ecol Modell 500(110949): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110949
Ornelas AC, Providello A, Soares MR, Viani R, 2022. Silvicultural intensification has a limited impact on tree growth in forest restoration plantations in croplands. For Ecol Manag 503: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119795
Ospina OL, Vanegas S, Escobar GA, Ramírez W, Sánchez JJ, 2015. Plan Nacional de Restauración: restauración ecológica, rehabilitación y recuperación de áreas disturbadas. Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. 92 pp.
Pabón-Morales MÁ, Prato AI, Tonello KC, Zuluaga-Peláez JJ, Bucheli-León PE, Winckler-Caldeira MV, 2023. Rainfall partitioning in two native tree legumes in the Andean region, Colombia. Rev Chapingo Ser Cienc For Ambiente 29(2): 71–85. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2022.08.059
Paul C, Griess V, Havardi-Burger N, Weber M, 2015. Timber-based agrisilviculture improves financial viability of hardwood plantations: a case study from Panama. Agroforest Syst 89: 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9755-9
Pinnschmidt A, Yousefpour R, Nölte A, Murillo O, Hanewinkel M, 2023. Economic potential and management of tropical mixed-species plantations in Central America. New For 54(3): 565–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-022-09937-7
Ramírez J, Marín A, Gómez A, del Valle J, 2024. Growth and yield of Retrophyllum rospigliosii pure plantations in the Colombian Andes. New For 55(5): 1363–1378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-024-10035-z
Ríos IV, Prato AI, Castaño AF, 2021. Effects of hydrogel use in Cariniana pyriformis (Lecythidaceae) seedlings under different water regimes. Floresta e Ambiente 28(2), e20200009: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087-FLORAM-2020-0009
Rodríguez N, Armenteras D, Retana J, 2013. Land use and land cover change in the Colombian Andes: dynamics and future scenarios. J Land Use Sci 8(2): 154–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2011.650228
Salazar JC, Melgarejo LM, Casanoves F, Di Rienzo J, DaMatta F, Armas C, 2018. Photosynthesis limitations in cacao leaves under different agroforestry systems in the Colombian Amazon. PLoS One 13(11): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206149
Santos F, Balieiro F, Ataíde D, Diniz A, Chaer G, 2016. Dynamics of aboveground biomass accumulation in monospecific and mixed-species plantations of Eucalyptus and Acacia on a Brazilian sandy soil. For Ecol Manag 363: 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.12.028
Schetinni B, Jacovine LA, Carneiro A, Eleto CM, Castro RV, Villanova PE, Rocha SJ, Rufi MP, Neto S, Júnior Morais V, 2022. Use of destructive and non-destructive methodologies to estimate stem biomass accumulation and carbon stock in an Eucalyptus forest. Árvore 46(e4611): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-908820220000011
Sinacore K, García H, Howard T, Breugel M, Lopez O, Finkral A, Hall J, 2023. Towards effective reforestation: growth and commercial value of four commonly planted tropical timber species on infertile soils in Panama. New For 54: 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-022-09906-0
Torres D, del Valle J, Restrepo G, 2020. Teak growth, yield- and thinnings’ simulation in volume and biomass in Colombia. Ann For Res 63(1): 53–70. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2019.1722
Van Bich N, Eyles A, Mendham D, Dong T, Ratkowsky D, Evans K, Hai V, Thanh H, Thinh N, Mohammed C, 2018. Contribution of harvest residues to nutrient cycling in a tropical Acacia mangium Willd. plantation. Forests 9(9): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9090577
World Bank, 2023. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2023. World Bank, Washington, DC, USA. 165 pp.
Zuluaga JJ, Prato AI, Zapata LP, Zarate D, 2018. Phenology of Cariniana pyriformis in the Magdalena Medio region of Santander, northeastern Colombia. Pesq Flor Bras 38: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4336/2018.pfb.38e201701414
Copyright (c) 2025 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
