Effectiveness of the obligation of keeping forest strips for native forest connectivity and conservation in the dry Chaco, Argentina
Abstract
Aim of study: The Chaco Region is one of the main deforestation hotspots in Latin America. Forest strips, i.e. native forest strips that surround cultivated areas, were established by the end of 1980’s as an attempt to mitigate the effects of wind erosion and as a way of conserving and interconnecting the remaining native forest patches. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of the scheme for the authorization of new agricultural land in the conservation of native forests.
Area of study: The most recent nuclei of agricultural expansion in the provinces of Chaco, Santiago del Estero, Salta and Formosa, Argentina.
Materials and methods: Landscape structure, forest connectivity and compliance with the obligation of leaving forest strips was assessed in satellite images for the years 1988 and 2015 within a Geographic Information System.
Main results: Forest strips differ from other forest patches in structure, presenting a greater perimeter/area ratio and smaller mean size. A great loss of landscape connectivity, lower than expected compliance of regulations and few forest strips with the minimum mandatory width were observed. Notable differences between provinces were found.
Research highlights: Forest strips would not be effective to conserve and interconnect the native forest patches. In light of new land clearings, other alternatives should be proposed in which the remaining forest persists as few large fragments with landscape and extra-landscape scale interconnection and minimizing the edge effect.
Downloads
References
Adámoli J, Torrella S, Ginzburg R, 2007. Diversidad de las unidades de vegetación en la Provincia de Formosa. In: Manual de Biodiversidad de Chaco, Corrientes y Formosa; Casco SL, Basterra NI, Neiff JJ (eds). pp: 273-281. Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Corrientes.
Adámoli J, Torrella S, Ginzburg R, 2008. La expansión de la frontera agrícola en la región chaqueña: Perspectivas y riesgos ambientales. In: Agro y Ambiente: una agenda compartida para el desarrollo sustentable; Solbrig O, Adámoli J (eds.). Foro de la Cadena Agroindustrial Argentina.
Adámoli J, Ginzburg R, Torrella S, 2011. Escenarios productivos y ambientales del Chaco Argentino: 1977-2010. Fundación Producir Conservando. GESEAA, Universidad de Buenos Aires. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sebastian-Torrella/publication/261063511_Escenarios_Productivos_y_Ambientales_del_Chaco_Argentino_1977-2010/links/00b495331e6efbf8c3000000/Escenarios-Productivos-y-Ambientales-del-Chaco-Argentino-1977-2010.pdf
Astrada E, Blasco C, 2007. Experiencias de aplicación de modelos de manejo de recursos enmarcados en el desarrollo rural sustentable. Su vinculación a los paisajes chaqueños. In: Panorama de la Ecología de Paisajes en Argentina y Países Sudamericanos; Matteucci S (eds.). pp: 79-90. INTA, Buenos Aires.
Blouin M, Connor E, 1985. Is there a best shape for nature reserves? Biol Conserv 32: 277-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(85)90114-4
BORA, 2007. Law 26,331, of 26 December, that established minimum standards for environmental protection of native forests. Boletín Oficial de la República Argentina No. 31, 310, 26/12/07.
Brown A, Martinez Ortiz U, Acerbi M, Corcuera J, 2006. Conclusiones de la situación ambiental por ecorregiones. In: La situación ambiental argentina 2005; Brown A, Martinez Ortiz U, Acerbi M, Corcuera J (eds). pp: 373-378. Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina, Buenos Aires.
Camba Sans GH, Verón SR, Paruelo JM, 2021. Forest strips increase connectivity and modify forests' functioning in a deforestation hotspot. J Environ Manage 290: 112606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112606
De la Guerra M, De Lucio Fernández J, Martínez Alandi C, Sastre Olmos P, Atauri-Mezquida J, Montes del Olmo C, 2002. Integración territorial de espacios naturales protegidos y conectividad ecológica en paisajes mediterráneos. Dirección General de la RENP y Servicios Ambientales, Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía, Spain. 124 pp. https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/medioambiente/documentos_tecnicos/integra_territorial/integterri.html.
Diamond J, 1975. The island dilemma: Lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of natural reserves. Biol Conserv 7: 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(75)90052-X
Fahrig L, 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34: 487-515. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419
Fischer J, Lindenmayer D, 2007. Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16: 265-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00287.x
Foley J, DeFries R, Asner G, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter S, et al., 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309: 570-574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772
Ginzburg R, 2019. Expansión agrícola en la región chaqueña. Doctoral thesis. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ginzburg R, Torrella S, Adámoli J, 2012. Las cortinas forestales de bosque nativo, ¿son eficaces para mitigar los efectos de la expansión agrícola? RASADEP 3: 34-42.
Gómez-Valencia B, 2020. Mamíferos medianos y grandes en fragmentos de bosque de tres quebrachos, sudoeste de la provincia del Chaco. Doctoral thesis. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Grau H, Aide T, 2008. Globalization and land-use transitions in Latin America. Ecol Soc 13: 16. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02559-130216
Grau H, Gasparri N, Aide T, 2005. Agriculture expansion and deforestation in seasonally dry forests of north-west Argentina. Environ Conserv 32: 140-148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892905002092
Grilli G, Galetto L, 2009. Remoción de frutos de una especie invasora (Lantana camara, L.) en el Bosque Chaqueño de Córdoba (Argentina). Ecol Austral 19: 149-156.
Haddad N, Brudvig L, Clobert J, Davies K, Gonzalez A, Holt R, et al., 2015. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth's ecosystems. Sci Adv 1 (2): e1500052. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500052
Hansen M, Potapov P, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova S, Tyukavina A, Thau D, 2013. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342: 850-853. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244693
Harper K, Macdonald S, Burton P, Chen J, Brosofske K, Saunders S, et al., 2005. Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conserv Biol 19: 768-782. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00045.x
Herrera L, Sabatino M, Gastón A, Saura S, 2016. Grassland connectivity explains entomophilous plant species assemblages in an agricultural landscape of the Pampa Region, Argentina. Ecol Austral 42: 486-496. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12468
Kehoe L, Romero-Muñoz A, Polaina E, Estes L, Kreft H, Kuemmerle T, 2017. Biodiversity at risk under future cropland expansion and intensification. Nat Ecol Evol 1: 1129-1135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0234-3
Laurance W, 2014. Contemporary drivers of habitat fragmentation. In: Global Forest Fragmentation; Kettle CJ, Koh LP (eds). pp: 20-27. CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780642031.0020
Lindenmayer D, Cunningham R, Donnelly C, 1993. The conservation of arboreal marsupials in the montane ash forests of the Central Highlands of Victoria, southeast Australia. IV. The distribution and abundance of arboreal marsupials in retained linear strips (wildlife corridors) in timber production forests. Biol Conserv 66: 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(93)90006-M
Lopez de Casenave J, Pelotto J, Protomastro J, 1995. Edge-interior differences in vegetation structure and composition in a Chaco semi-arid forest, Argentina. For Ecol Manag 72: 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(94)03444-2
Lopez de Casenave J, Pelotto J, Caziani S, Mermoz M, Protomastro J, 1998. Responses of avian assemblages to a natural edge in a Chaco semiarid forest in Argentina. Auk 115: 425-435. https://doi.org/10.2307/4089201
Lovejoy T, Bierregaard R, Rylands A, Malcolm J, Quintela C, Harper L, et al., 1986. Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments. In: Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity; Soulé ME (eds.) pp. 258-285. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USA.
Matlack G, 1993. Microenvironment variation within and among forest edge sites in the eastern United States. Biol Conserv 66: 185-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(93)90004-K
Morello J, Adámoli J, 1974. Las grandes unidades de vegetación y ambiente del Chaco argentino. 2ª parte: Vegetación y ambiente de la Provincia del Chaco. Serie Fitogeográfica, INTA, Buenos Aires.
Morello, J, Matteucci S, Rodríguez A, 2012. Ecorregiones y Complejos Ecosistémicos Argentinos. Orientación Gráfica Editora. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 719 pp.
Muñoz Garachana D, Aragón R, Baldi G, 2018. Estructura espacial de remanentes de bosque nativo en el Chaco Seco y el Espinal. Ecol Austral 28: 553-564. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.18.28.3.0.767
Naumann M, Madariaga M, 2003. Atlas del Gran Chaco Sudamericano. Sociedad Alemana de Cooperación Técnica (GTZ), Buenos Aires. https://redaf.org.ar/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/ATLAS_GRAN_CHACO_ES.pdf
Núñez-Regueiro M, Branch L, Fletcher R, Marás G, Derlindati E, Tálamo A, 2015. Spatial patterns of mammal occurrence in forest strips surrounded by agricultural crops of the Chaco region, Argentina. Biol Conserv 187: 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.001
Prado D, 1993. What is the Gran Chaco vegetation in South America? I. A review. Contribution to the study of flora and vegetation of the Chaco. V. Candollea 48: 145-172.
Recher H, Shields J, Kavanagh R, Webb G, 1987. Retaining remnant mature forest for nature conservation at Eden, New South Wales: a review of theory and practice. In: Nature conservation: the role of remnants of vegetation; Saunders DA et al., (eds). pp: 177-94. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, N.S.W., Australia.
Saunders D, Hobbs R, Margules C, 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol 5: 18-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00384.x
Saura S, Torné J, 2009. Conefor Sensinode 2.2: a software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity. Environ Model Softw 24: 135-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.05.005
Saura S, Estreguil C, Mouton C, Rodríguez Freire M, 2011. Network analysis to assess landscape connectivity trends: Application to European forests (1990-2000). Ecol Indic 11: 407-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.06.011
Torrella S, 2014. Fragmentación y pérdida del "Bosque de Tres Quebrachos" y su comunidad de plantas leñosas en el SO de la Provincia de Chaco. Doctoral thesis. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Torrella S, Ginzburg R, Adámoli J, Galetto L, 2013. Changes in forest structure and tree recruitment in Argentinean Chaco: Effects of fragment size and landscape forest cover. For Ecol Manag 307: 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.016
UMSEF, 2018. Monitoreo de la superficie de bosque nativo de la República Argentina. Unidad de Manejo del Sistema de Evaluación Forestal; Dirección de Bosques; Subsecretaría de Planificación y Política Ambiental; Secretaría de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable de la Nación. Argentina. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/ambiente/bosques/umsef.
Volante J, Mosciaro J, Morales Poclava M, Vale L, Castrillo S, Sawchik J, et al., 2015. Expansión agrícola en Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay, Uruguay y Chile entre 2000-2010. Caracterización espacial mediante series temporales de índices de vegetación. RIA 41: 179-191.
Copyright (c) 2022 Forest Systems
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
