The effect of stand characteristics on soil organic carbon content in spruce and deciduous stands
Abstract
Aim of study: To determine the effects of stand characteristics, which closely relate to forest management practices, on the soil organic carbon (SOC) content in the organic (O) and surface mineral (A) soil horizons in spruce and deciduous stands, and to show SOC dynamics during the life of production stands.
Area of study: Spruce and deciduous stands located throughout the Czech Republic.
Material and methods: The effects of age, density of stocking and canopy of stand on SOC content in the O and A horizons, and the difference between categories of variables and the trends of SOC were evaluated in spruce and deciduous stands (401 plots) at lower and middle elevations.
Main results: SOC content changed during the life of stands. In spruce stands, a decreasing trend of SOC with stand age was found in the A horizon. In deciduous stands, SOC content was higher overall in the A horizon, fluctuating slightly with stand age, but more balanced during the life of stands. Based on the results, in terms of management of dying spruce stands and carbon sequestration, felling should be carried out in the age group of 81-120 years in spruce stands, whereas in deciduous stands felling should take place in older stands (141 years and more). Density of stocking and canopy of stand had no substantial effect of SOC content.
Research highlights: Deciduous stands have the potential to replace dying spruce stands at lower elevation in terms of carbon sequestration.
Downloads
References
Angst G, Mueller KE, Eissenstat DM, Trumbore S, Freeman KH, Hobbie SE et al., 2019. Soil organic carbon stability in forests: Distinct effects of tree species identity and traits. Global Change Biol 25(4): 1529-1546. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14548
Augusto L, De Schrijver A, Vesterdal L, Smolander A, Prescott C, Ranger J, 2015. Influences of evergreen gymnosperm and deciduous angiosperm tree species on the functioning of temperate and boreal forests. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 90(2): 444-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12119
Błońska E, Klamerus-Iwan A, Lasota J, Gruba P, Pach M, Pretzsch H, 2018. What characteristics of soil fertility can improve in mixed stands of Scots pine and European beech compared with monospecific stands? Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 49(2): 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2017.1421658
Bravo-Oviedo A, Ruiz-Peinado R, Modrego P, Alonso R, Montero G, 2015. Forest thinning impact on carbon stock and soil condition in Southern European populations of P. sylvestris L. For Ecol Manag 357: 259-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.08.005
Bruckman VJ, Yan S, Hochbichler E, Glatzel G, 2011. Carbon pools and temporal dynamics along a rotation period in Quercus dominated high forest and coppice with standards stands. For Ecol Manag 262: 1853-1962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.08.006
Cao J, Gong Y, Adamowski JF, Deo RC, Zhu G, Dong X et al., 2019. Effects of stand age on carbon storage in dragon spruce forest ecosystems in the upper reaches of the Bailongjiang River basin, China. Scientific Reports 9: 3005. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39626-z
Čermák P, Jankovský L, Cudlin P, 2004. Risk evaluation of the climatic change impact on secondary Norway spruce stands as exemplified by the Křtiny Training Forest Enterprise. J For Sci 50(6): 256-262. https://doi.org/10.17221/4623-JFS
Chen HYH, Shrestha BM, 2012. Stand age, fire and clearcutting affect soil organic carbon and aggregation of mineral soils in boreal forests. Soil Biol Biochem 50: 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.03.014
Côté L, Brown S, Paré D, Fyles J, Bauhus J, 2000. Dynamics of carbon and nitrogen mineralization in relation to stand type, stand age and soil texture in the boreal mixed wood. Soil Biol Biochem 32: 1079-1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00017-1
Çömez A, Güner ST, Tolunay D, 2021. The effect of stand structure on litter decomposition in Pinus sylvestris L. stands in Turkey. Ann For Sci 78(1): 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-020-01023-2
Dawud SM, Raulund‐Rasmussen K, Domisch T, Finér L, Jaroszewicz B, Vesterdal L, 2016. Is tree species diversity or species identity the more important driver of soil carbon stocks, C/N ratio, and pH? Ecosystems 19: 645-660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-9958-1
De Schrijver A, de Frenne P, Staelens J, Verstraeten G, Muys B, Vesterdal L et al., 2012. Tree species traits cause divergence in soil acidification during four decades of postagricultural forest development. Global Change Biol 18(3): 1127-1140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02572.x
Devi AS, 2021. Influence of trees and associated variables on soil organic carbon: A review. J Ecol Environ 45: 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-021-00180-3
Dieler J, Uhl E, Biber P, Müller J, Rötzer T, Pretzsch H, 2017. Effect of forest stand management on species composition, structural diversity, and productivity in the temperate zone of Europe. Eur J For Res 136: 739-766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-017-1056-1
Dušek D, 2015. Potenciál pěstování smrku ztepilého v oblastech jeho chronického chřadnutí [Potential for growing Norway spruce in areas of its chronic decline]. Dissertation. Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic.
Gillman GP, Sinclair DF, Beech TA, 1986. Recovery of organic carbon by the Walkley and Black procedure in highly weathered soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 17(8): 885-892. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628609367759
Grewal KF, Buchan GD, Sherlock RR, 1991. A comparison of three methods of organic carbon determination in some New Zealand Soils. J Soil Sci 42: 251-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1991.tb00406.x
Hanewinkel M, Cullmann DA, Schelhaas MJ, Nabuurs GJ, Zimmermann NE, 2013. Climate change may cause severe loss in the economic value of European forest land. Nature Climate Change 3: 203-207. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1687
Hernandez J, del Pino A, Vance ED, Califra A, Del Giorgio F, Martinez L, Gonzalez Barrios P, 2016. Eucalyptus and Pinus stand density effects on soil carbon sequestration. For Ecol Manag 368: 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.03.007
Hobbie SE, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Ogdahl M, Zytkowiak R, Hale C, Karolewski P, 2006. Tree species effects on decomposition and forest floor dynamics in a common garden. Ecology 87(9): 2288-2297. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2288:TSEODA]2.0.CO;2
Holuša J, Lubojacký J, Čurn V, Tonka T, Lukášová K, Horák J, 2018. Combined effects of drought stress and Armillaria infection on tree mortality in Norway spruce plantations. For Ecol Manag 427: 434-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.01.031
Horváth M, Hanáková Bečvářová P, Šarapatka B, Vencálek O, Zouhar V, 2021. Potential relationships of selected abiotic variables, chemical elements and stand characteristic with soil organic carbon in spruce and beech stands. iForest 14: 320-328. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor3654-014
Hou G, Delang CO, Lu X, Gao L, 2019. Soil organic carbon storage varies with stand ages and soil depths following afforestation. Ann For Res 62(1): 3-20. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2018.1294
Jandl R, Lindner M, Vesterdal L, Bauwens B, Baritz R, Hagedorn F et al., 2007. How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma 137: 253-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.09.003
Jonard M, Nicolas M, Caignet I, Ponette Q, Saenger A, Coomes DA, 2017. Forest soils in France are sequestering substantial amounts of carbon. Sci Total Environ 574: 616-628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.028
Kern NV, Cremer M, Prietzel J, 2016. Soil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks under pure and mixed stands of European beech, Douglas fir and Norway spruce. For Ecol Manag 367: 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.02.020
Klimo E, Kulhavý J, Hager H, 2000. Spruce monocultures in Central Europe: Problems and prospects. Proc Int Workshop, Brno, Czech Republic, 22-25 June 1998. https://efi.int/publications-bank/spruce-monocultures-central-europe-problems-and-prospects [15 July 2021].
Krishan G, Srivastav SK, Kumar S, Saha SK, Dadhwal VK, 2009. Quantifying the underestimation of soil organic carbon by the Walkley and Black technique -examples from Himalayan and Central Indian soils. Curr Sci 96: 1133-1136.
Kulmala L, Aaltonen H, Berninger F, Kieloaho AJ, Levula J, Back J, et al., 2014. Changes in biogeochemistry and carbon fluxes in a boreal forest after the clear-cutting and partial burning of slash. Agric For Meteorol 188: 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.12.003
López-Marcos D, Martínez-Ruiz C, Turrión MB, Jonard M, Titeux H, Ponette Q, Bravo F, 2018. Soil carbon stocks and exchangeable cations in monospecific and mixed pine forests. Eur J For Res 137: 831-847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-018-1143-y
Lorenz K, Lal R, 2010. Carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems. Springer, Netherlands, 279 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3266-9
Lorenz M, Sören TB, 2019. Tree species affect soil organic matter stocks and stoichiometry in interaction with soil microbiota. Geoderma 353: 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.06.021
Macků J, 2012. Methodology for establishing the degree of naturalness of forest stands. Acta Univ Agric Silvic Mendel Brun 18: 161-165. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201260050161
Marek MV, Ač A, Apltauer J, Bodlák L, Burešová R, Cienciala E, et al., 2011. Uhlík v ekosystémech České republiky v měnícím se klimatu [Carbon in ecosystems of Czech Republic in changing climate]. Academia Praha, Czech Republic, 253 pp.
Mareschal L, Bonnaud P, Turpault M, Ranger J, 2010. Impact of common European tree species on the chemical and physicochemical properties of fine earth: an unusual pattern. Eur J Soil Sci 61(1): 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01206.x
Mayer M, Sanden H, Rewald B, Godbold DL, Katzensteiner K, 2017. Increase in heterotrophic soil respiration by temperature drives decline in soil organic carbon stocks after forest windthrow in a mountainous ecosystem. Funct Ecol 31: 1163-1172. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12805
Mayer M, Prescott CE, Abaker WEA, Augusto L, Cécillon L, Ferreira GWD et al., 2020. Tamm Review: Influence of forest management activities on soil organic carbon stocks: A knowledge synthesis. For Ecol Manag 446: 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118127
Na M, Sun X, Zhang Y, Sun Z, Rousk J, 2021. Higher stand densities can promote soil carbon storage after conversion of temperate mixed natural forests to larch plantations. Eur J For Res140: 373-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-020-01346-9
Nelson DW, Sommers LE, 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 Chemical and microbiological properties; Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds). Am Soc Agron, Soil Sci Soc Am, Academic Press, Madison, USA, pp: 539-580. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c29
Nilsen P, Strand LT, 2008. Thinning intensity effects on carbon and nitrogen stores and fluxes in a Norway spruce stand (Picea abies (L) Karst.) stand after 33years. For Ecol Manag 256: 201-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.001
Nitsch P, Kaupenjohann M, Wulf M, 2018. Forest continuity, soil depth and tree species are important parameters for SOC stocks in an old forest (Templiner Buchheide, northeast Germany). Geoderma 310: 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.08.041
Noh NJ, Kim C, Bae SW, Lee WK, Yoon TK, Muraoka H, Son Y, 2013. Carbon and nitrogen dynamics in a Pinus densiflora forest with low and high stand densities. J Plant Ecol 6: 368-379. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtt007
Pajtík J, Cihak T, Konôpka B, Merganicova K, Fabiánek P, 2018. Annual tree mortality and felling rates in the Czech Republic and Slovakia over three decades. Central Eur Forest J 64(3-4): 238-248.
Pardos M, del Río M, Pretzsch H, Jactel H, Bielak K, Bravo F et al., 2021. The greater resilience of mixed forests to drought mainly depends on their composition: Analysis along a climate gradient across Europe. For Ecol Manag 481: 118687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118687
Prescott CE, 2002. The influence of the forest canopy on nutrient cycling. Tree Physiol 22(15-16): 1193-1200. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/22.15-16.1193
Pretzsch H, Schütze G, Biber P, 2018. Drought can favour the growth of small in relation to tall trees in mature stands of Norway spruce and European beech. Forest Ecosyst 5: 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-018-0139-x
Pretzsch H, Grams T, Häberle KH, Pritsch K, Rötzer T, 2020. Growth and mortality of Norway spruce and European beech in monospecific and mixed‑species stands under natural episodic and experimentally extended drought. Results of the KROOF through fall exclusion experiment. Trees 34: 957-970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-020-01973-0
Pulkrab K, Sloup M, Sloup R, 2014. Ekonomická doba obmýtí. [Economic rotation period]. Lesnícky časopis - Forestry J 60: 223-230. https://doi.org/10.1515/forj-2015-0004
Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Modrzynski J, Mrozinski P, Hobbie SE, Eissenstat DM et al., 2005. Linking litter calcium, earthworms and soil properties: a common garden test with 14 tree species. Ecol Lett 8(8): 811-818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00779.x
Ruiz-Peinado R, Bravo-Oviedo A, Lopez-Senespleda E, Bravo F, 2017: Forest management and carbon sequestration in the Mediterranean region: A review. Forest Syst 26(2): eR04S. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2017262-11205
Šrámek V, Novotný R, Fadrhonsová V, 2015. Chřadnutí smrkových porostů a stav lesních půd v oblasti Severní Moravy a Slezska (PLO 29 a 39) [Decay of Norway spruce stands and quality of forest soils in the region of Northern Moravia and Silesia]. Rep Forest Res 60(2): 147-153.
Van Kooten GCV, Binkley CS, Delcourt G, 1995. Effect of carbon taxes and subsidies on optimal forest rotation age and supply of carbon services. Am J Agr Econ 77: 365-374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243546
Walkley A, Black IA, 1934. An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37(1): 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
Wiesmeier M, Prietzel J, Barthold F, Spörlein P, Geuß U, Hangen E et al., 2013. Storage and drivers of organic carbon in forest soils of southeast Germany (Bavaria) - Implications for carbon sequestration. For Ecol Manag 295: 162-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.01.025
WRB, 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps, update 2015. World Reference Base for Soil Resources. http://www.fao.org/3/i3794en/I3794en.pdf [10 Jun 2021].
Yao X, Yu K, Deng Y, Liu J, Lai Z, 2019. Spatial variability of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in the hilly red soil region of Southern China. J Forest Res 31: 2385-2394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-019-01014-8
Zbíral J, Malý S, Váňa M, Čuhel J, Fojtlová E, 2011. Standard operating procedure, soil analysis III. Central Institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture, Brno, Czech Republic, 252 pp.
Zeller L, Pretzsch H, 2019. Effect of forest structure on stand productivity in Central European forests depends on developmental stage and tree species diversity. For Ecol Manag 434(1): 193-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.12.024
Zhang X, Guan DX, Li W, Sun D, 2018. The effects of forest thinning on soil carbon stocks and dynamics: A meta-analysis. For Ecol Manag 429: 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.06.027
Copyright (c) 2022 Forest Systems
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
