Temporal analysis of canopy gap distribution in natural forests: comparing managed and unmanaged stands using Quickbird and UltraCam-D imagery
Abstract
Aim of study: To investigate and analyze the temporal and spatial distribution patterns of canopy gaps in managed and unmanaged forest stands using remote sensing images from different sources, emphasizing the relevance of these patterns in the context of natural processes and human interventions. Area of study: Managed and unmanaged stands of Dr. Bahramnia Forestry Plan, Hyrcanian forest, Golestan Province, Iran. Material and methods: High-resolution satellite imagery, including QuickBird (2007) and UltraCam-D (2011) digital aerial images, were utilized to detect canopy gaps. This study employed pixel-based classification methods, such as Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) algorithms, along with object-based methods, including Nearest Neighbor (NN), Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), and Bayes, for classification and to extract canopy gaps. Spatial distribution patterns were analyzed using the Nearest Neighbor Index, spatial autocorrelation, and clustering based on gap size, employing global Getis-Ord and local Moran’s I statistics. Main results: The results indicated that pixel-based classification methods achieved higher accuracy in mapping gap and non-gap areas, with the ML algorithm attaining 98.763% accuracy and a Kappa coefficient of 0.974 in 2007, and the SVM algorithm achieving 98.899% accuracy and a Kappa coefficient of 0.976 in 2011. The Nearest Neighbor Index revealed a regular spatial distribution of gaps in both managed and unmanaged stands. Clustering analysis showed distinct patterns for small, medium, and large gaps, with managed stands exhibiting clustering and unmanaged stands displaying random and regular patterns. Research highlights: This study underscores the importance of high-resolution remote sensing data and advanced classification algorithms for accurately mapping canopy gap dynamics, providing valuable insights for sustainable forest management.
Downloads
References
Amini Sh, Moayeri M, Shataee Jouibary Sh, Rahmani R, 2021. “Geometric indices and species diversity of regeneration in natural and human-made canopy gaps”, Journal of Wood and For Sci and Tech, 28(1), 1-20. (In Persian) http://doi.org/10.22069/jwfst.2021.18417.1891
Amini Sh, Shataee Jouibary Sh, Moayeri MH, Rahmani R, 2022. “Mapping canopy gaps in Caspian forests using UAV data (Case study: ShastKalateh forest, Gorgan)”, Irani J of For, 14(2), 135-154. http://doi.org/10.22034/ijf.2022.301540.1801
Breiman L, 2001. Random forests. Machine learning, 45(1), 5-32.
Clark PJ, Evans FC, 1954. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology, 35(4), 445-453. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931034.
Cover T, Hart P, 1967. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE transactions on information theory, 13(1), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964
Cox IJ, Hingorani SL, Rao SB, Maggs BM, 1996. A maximum likelihood stereo algorithm. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 63(3), 542-567. https://doi.org/10.1006/cviu.1996.0040.
Farzalizadeh F, Hemmati M, Falahchai R, 2021. Effect of different gap sizes on biological and enzymatic activities of soil in beech forests (Case study: District 7, Shenrud, Siahkal), Journal of Forest and Wood Products, 74(3), 301-310. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfwp.2021.312726.1139
Felix FC, Spalevic V, Curovic M, Mincato RL, 2021. Comparing pixel-and object-based forest canopy gaps classification using low-cost unmanned aerial vehicle imagery. Poljoprivreda i Sumarstvo, 67(3), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.17707/AgricultForest.67.3.02
Fraver S, 1994. Vegetation responses along edge-to-interior gradients in the mixed hardwood forests of the Roanoke River Basin, North Carolina. Conservation Biology, 8(3), 822-832. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08030822.x
Gaulton R, Malthus TJ, 2010. LiDAR mapping of canopy gaps in continuous cover forests: A comparison of canopy height model and point cloud-based techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 31(5), 1193-1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160903380565
Garbarino M, Borgogno Mondino E, Lingua E, Nagel TA, Dukić V, Govedar Z, Motta R, 2012. Gap disturbances and regeneration patterns in a Bosnian old-growth forest: a multispectral remote sensing and ground-based approach. Annals of Forest Science, 69, 617-625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-011-0177-9
Getzin S, Nuske RS, Wiegand K, 2014. Using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) to quantify spatial gap patterns in forests. Remote Sensing, 6(8), 6988-7004. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6086988
Gray AN, Spies TA. 1996. Gap size, within-gap position, and canopy structure effects on conifer seedling establishment. Journal of Ecology, 635-645. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261327
Hart PE, Stork DG, Duda RO, 2001. Pattern classification. Hoboken: Wiley. 688 pp. Pattern Classification, 2nd Edition | Wiley
Hearst MA, Dumais ST, Osuna E, Platt J, Scholkopf B, 1998. Support vector machines. IEEE Intelligent Systems and their applications, 13(4), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1109/5254.708428
Jackson CM, 2022. The remote sensing of forest canopy gaps in a selectively logged submontane tropical forest reserve in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, University of Witwatersrand).
Jedrzejewska B, Okarma H, Jedrzejewski W, Milkowski L, 1994. Effects of exploitation and protection on forest structure, ungulate density and wolf predation in Bialowieza Primeval Forest. Poland. J of App Eco, 664-676. https://doi.org/10.2307/2404157
Kheiri M, Habashi H, VaezMoosavi SM, Moghimian N, 2012. Effects of canopy gap on soil macro fauna in mixed beech stand (case study in Shastkalateh forest). Human & Environment, 1(31), 101. (In Persian) https://www.magiran.com/p1164035
Khalili Z, Fallah A, Shataee Jouibary Sh, 2023. Analysis of canopy gap dynamics using ultrahigh-resolution aerial imagery and UAV in planted coniferous stands, Arab-Dagh, Golestan Province, Research in Wood and Forest Science and Technology, 30(3), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.22069/JWFST.2023.21512.2022
Koosari Palangi Gh, 2015. Identification and mapping of forest canopy gaps using LiDAR data and aerial imagery. MSc Thesis. Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, p. 111.
Kubo T, Iwasa Y, Furumoto N, 1996. Forest spatial dynamics with gap expansion: total gap area and gap size distribution. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 180(3), 229-246. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1996.0099
Inoni OE, 2009. Effects of forest resources exploitation on the economic well-being of rural households in Delta State, Nigeria. Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica, 42(1), 20-27. http://projects.its.czu.cz/ats/pdf_files/vol_42_1_pdf/inoni.pdf
Lingua E, Garbarino M, Mondino EB, Motta R, 2011. Natural disturbance dynamics in an old-growth forest: from tree to landscape. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 7, 365-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2011.07.063
Liu F, Yang ZG, Zhang G, 2020. Canopy gap characteristics and spatial patterns in a subtropical forest of South China after ice storm damage. Journal of Mountain Science, 17(8), 1942-1958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-020-6020-8
Malahlela O, Cho MA, Mutanga O, 2014. Mapping canopy gaps in an indigenous subtropical coastal forest using high-resolution WorldView-2 data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 35(17), 6397-6417. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2014.954061
Mazdi RA, Mataji A, Fallah A, 2021. Canopy gap dynamics, disturbances, and natural regeneration patterns in a beech-dominated Hyrcanian old-growth forest. Baltic Forestry, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.46490/bf535.
Moayeri MH, Hajivand A, Shataee Jouibary S, Rahbari Sisakht S, 2017. Spatial pattern and characteristic of tree-fall gaps to approach ecological forestry in Northern Iran. Environmental Resources Research, 5(1), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.22069/IJERR.2017.10249.1127
Mohammadi J, Shataee S, Namiranian M, Næsset E, 2017. Modeling biophysical properties of broad-leaved stands in the Hyrcanian forests of Iran using fused airborne laser scanner data and UltraCam-D images. International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation, 61, 32-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2017.05.003
Naseri MH, Shataee Jouibary Sh, Mohammadi J, Ahmadi Sh. 2020. Study of decline in Persian oak trees (Lindi – Quercus brantii) using satellite imagery in the Dasht-e Barm forests of Fars Province. Iranian Journal of Forest Ecology, 8(16), pp. 72–80. https://doi.org/10.52547/ifej.8.16.72
Naseri MH, Shataee Jouibary Sh, Habashi H, 2022. Zoning of canopy leaf burn percentage using UAV and Sentinel-2 imagery in Deland Forest Park, Golestan Province. Research in Wood and Forest Science and Technology, 29(4), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.22069/jwfst.2023.20939.2001
Naseri MH, Shataee Jouibary Sh, 2024. UAV-Based Detection of Deciduous Tree Species Using Structural and Spectral Characteristics. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 52(10), 2207-2219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-024-01944-9.
Nyamgeroh BB, Groen TA, Weir MJ, Dimov P, Zlatanov T, 2018. Detection of forest canopy gaps from very high-resolution aerial images. Ecological Indicators, 95, 629-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.011
Quinlan JR, 1986. Induction of decision trees. Machine learning, 1(1), 81-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116251
Ord JK, Getis A, 1995. Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: distributional issues and an application. Geographical analysis, 27(4), 286-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00912.x
Rabins G, 2019. Canopy gap characteristics, their size distribution, and spatial pattern in a mountainous cool temperate forest of Japan. Forest Ecology and Management. Master’s Thesis, University of Helsinki, 60 pp. https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/299946
Richards A.J. 2020. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis. Sixth Edition 2022, Springer, 587 pages.
Rodes-Blanco M, Ruiz-Benito P, Silva CA, García M, 2023. Canopy gap patterns in Mediterranean forests: a spatio-temporal characterization using airborne LiDAR data. Landscape Ecology, 38(12), 3427-3442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-023-01663-5
Runkel JR, 1981. Gap Regeneration in some old-growth forests of the eastern United States. Ecology, 62: 1041-1051. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937003
Salem, MAMM. 2008. Multiresolution image segmentation. PhD Desertation, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. https://doi.org/10.18452/15846
Vepakomma U, St-Onge B, Kneeshaw D, 2008. Spatially explicit characterization of boreal forest gap dynamics using multi-temporal lidar data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(5), 2326-2340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.10.001.
Vepakomma U, Kneeshaw D, Fortin MJ, 2012. Spatial contiguity and continuity of canopy gaps in mixed wood boreal forests: Persistence, expansion, shrinkage and displacement. Journal of Ecology, 100(5), 1257-1268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.01996.x
Watt AS, 1947. Pattern and process in the plant community. Journal of Ecology, 35(1/2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9623-95.2.28
Wang Z, Yang H, Dong B, Zhou M, Ma L, Jia Z, Duan J, 2017. Effects of canopy gap size on growth and spatial patterns of Chinese pine (Pinus tabulaeformis) regeneration. Forest Ecology and Management, 385, 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.11.022
Wirth R, Weber B, Ryel RJ, 2001. Spatial and temporal variability of canopy structure in a tropical moist forest. Acta Oecologica, 22(5-6), 235-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1146-609X(01)01123-7
Xuegang M, Liang Z, Fan W, 2020. Object-oriented automatic identification of forest gaps using digital orthophoto maps and LiDAR data. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 46(2), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2020.1768515
Yamamoto SI, 2000. Forest gap dynamics and tree regeneration. Journal of forest research, 5, 223-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02767114
Copyright (c) 2026 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
