Use of Eucalytpus mixed with native species for initial reforestation in the Atlantic Forest
Abstract
Aim of study: With increasing pressure to restore degraded environments, mixed plantations composed of exotic species with economic interest and native species have been identified as an important strategy to attract the interest of farmers. However, knowledge regarding the interactions among and impacts of species in these areas is still lacking. We investigated the effect of introducing Eucalyptus combined with high native species diversity to restore an Atlantic Forest region in Brazil 42 months after planting.
Area of study: Restoration of an Atlantic Forest area in Santo Antonio do Amparo, Brazil. We evaluated different proportions of Eucalyptus and native species and the effect of the biodiversity of species on tree growth.
Material and Methods: The experiment followed a completely randomised block design with four replicates using a 3 × 19 factorial scheme. The first factor corresponded to the percentage of Eucalyptus plants relative to native species (25%, 33%, and 50%), and the second factor was the species composition. Height, diameter at breast height, biomass, and total carbon were measured at 42 months. We performed an analysis of variance (ANOVA), and when significant differences were detected, the means were compared using the Tukey’s test (5%) for models and the Scott-Knott test (5%) for species.
Main results: We observed that with the increase in Eucalyptus density, there was an increase in biomass and carbon stock in the evaluated areas due to the rapid growth of the species. Furthermore, lower Eucalyptus density (33%) reduced intraspecific competition between the individuals, which benefited greater individual growth of Eucalyptus trees. In addition, the development of fast-growing native species was reduced with the increase in Eucalyptus density.
Research highlights: Increasing the proportion of Eucalyptus to 25-33% can reduce the costs of restoring Atlantic Forest areas in Brazil while enhancing the financial viability of reforestation through Eucalyptus wood production.
Downloads
References
Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, Gonçalves JLM, Sparovek G, 2013. Koppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Z 22(6): 711-728. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
Amazonas NT, Forrester DI, Oliveira RS, Brancalion PHS, 2018. Combining Eucalyptus wood production with the recovery of native tree diversity in mixed plantings: Implications for water use and availability. For Ecol Manage 418: 34-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.12.006
Amazonas NT, Forrester DI, Silva CC, Almeida DRA, Oliveira RS, Rodrigues RR, Brancalion PHS, 2021. Light and nutrient-related relationships in mixed plantations of Eucalyptus and a high diversity of native tree species. New For 52(5): 807-828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-020-09826-x
Binkley D, Campoe OC, Alcarde C, Lorenzato R, Stape JL, 2020. Variation in whole-rotation yield among Eucalyptus genotypes in response to water and heat stresses: The TECHS project. For Ecol Manage 462: 117953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117953
Brancalion PHS, Amazonas NT, Chazdon RL, van Melis J, Rodrigues RR, Silva CC, Sorrini TB, Holl KD, 2020. Exotic eucalypts: From demonized trees to allies of tropical forest restoration? J Appl Ecol 57(1): 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13513
Brancalion PHS, Garcia LC, Loyola R, Rodrigues RR, Pillar VD, Lewinsohn TM, 2016. A critical analysis of the Native Vegetation Protection Law of Brazil (2012): updates and ongoing initiatives. Braz J Nat Conserv 14: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncon.2016.03.004
Brancalion PHS, Meli P, Tymus JRC, Lenti FEB, Benini RM, Paula A, Silva M, Isernhagen I, Holl KD, 2019. What makes ecosystem restoration expensive? A systematic cost assessment of projects in Brazil. Biol Conserv 240: 108274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108274
Brazil, 2012. Law No. 12,651 of May 25, 2012. Establishes rules for native vegetation protection, Permanent Preservation Areas (APPs), and Legal Reserves. Official Gazette of the Federative Republic of Brazil, May 28, 2012.
Brockerhoff EG, Jactel H, Parrotta JA, Ferraz SFB, 2013. Role of eucalypt and other planted forests in biodiversity conservation and the provision of biodiversity-related ecosystem services. For Ecol Manage 301: 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.09.018
Carvalho DC, Pereira MG, Toledo LO, Simon CA, Silva Rodrigues J, Fernandes JCF, Neto ECS, 2017. Ciclagem de nutrientes de um plantio de eucalipto em regeneração de espécies nativas no sub-bosque. Floresta 47(1): 17-27. https://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v47i1.43652
Dutra S, Filho APSS, Mascarenhas REB, 2003. Controle Integrado das Espécies Invasoras Assa-peixe e Casadinha em Pastagens Cultivadas de Paragominas, Nordeste Paraense. Bol Pesq Desenv 13: 1-33.
IPCC, 2006. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. http://www.ipcc.ch
Kirschbaum MUF, Cowie AL, Penuelas J, Smith P, Cotrufo MF, Conant RT, Sage RF, Brandão M, Co, Luo Y, Way DA, Robinson SA, 2024. Is tree planting an effective strategy for climate change mitigation? Sci Total Environ 909: July 2023.
Luz MS, 2024. Práticas silviculturais intensivas influenciam positivamente no estoque de carbono de florestas de restauração [Thesis]. Univ Fed Lavras (UFLA).
Oliveira EB, Santos LMF, Gobor D, Moris AC, Tina V, 2014. Produtividade de plantações de Eucalyptus intercaladas com espécies nativas em áreas de pastagens degradadas no noroeste do estado do Paraná. Encontro Bras Silvic 337-340.
Pryde EC, Holland GJ, Watson SJ, Turton SM, Nimmo DG, 2015. Conservation of tropical forest tree species in a native timber plantation landscape. For Ecol Manage 339: 96-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.11.028
Scolforo JR, Thiersch CR, 2004. Biometria florestal medição, volumetria e gravimetria. UFLA/FAEPE.
Silva CC, 2017. Impacto ecológico e silvicultural do uso e colheita de eucalipto consorciado com espécies arbóreas nativas para a restauração da Mata Atlântica. USP / Escola Sup Agric Luiz de Queiroz.
Soares-Filho B, Rajão R, Macedo M, Carneiro A, Costa W, Coe M, Rodrigues H, Alencar A, 2014. Cracking Brazil’s Forest Code. Science 344: 363-364.
Viani AGR, Durigan G, Melo ACG, 2010. A regeneração natural sob plantações florestais: desertos verdes ou redutos de biodiversidade? Cien Florest 20(3): 533-552.
Wu J, Fan H, Liu W, Huang G, Tang J, Zeng R, Huang J, Liu Z, 2015. Should Exotic Eucalyptus be Planted in Subtropical China? Insights from Understory Plant Diversity in Two Contrasting Eucalyptus Chronosequences. Environ Manage, August. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0578-x
Yamasaki A, 2003. An Overview of CO₂ Mitigation Options for Global Warming—Emphasizing CO₂ Sequestration Options. J Chem Eng Jpn 36(4): 361-375.
Copyright (c) 2025 Bruna S. Crivilin, Fernanda L. Cunha, Josiana J. N. Basílio, Lucas A. de Melo, Soraya A. Botelho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
