Forest Systems 33 (1)
January-April 2024, eSC01
eISSN: 2171-9845, ISSN-L: 2171-5068
https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2024331-20587
INIA-CSIC

SHORT COMMUNICATION

Cross species transferability of G-SSR and EST-SSR markers to Neltuma affinis Spreng

María C. Soldati

Instituto de Recursos Biológicos (IRB), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Los Reseros y N. Repetto, s/n, Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8083-6630

Gregorio Gavier-Pizarro

Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales (IFRGV), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Cno. A 60 cuadras km 5.5 (5119), Córdoba, Argentina.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3239-0595

Matías Morales

Instituto de Recursos Biológicos (IRB), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Los Reseros y N. Repetto, s/n, Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Godoy Cruz 2290, CABA, Argentina.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5540-9725

María F. Pomponio

Instituto de Recursos Biológicos (IRB), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Los Reseros y N. Repetto, s/n, Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1839-7371

Noga Zelener

Centro de Investigación en Recursos Naturales, INTA. Los Reseros y N. Repetto s/n, Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0269-3997

Abstract
Aim of study:
 To examine the transferability of G-SSR (genomic simple sequence repeats) and EST-SSR (expressed sequence tag simple sequence repeats) markers developed for several Neltuma species to N. affinis, a species with no genomic data.

Area of study:
 West-Center of Entre Ríos province, Argentina. The set of molecular markers here proposed can be used to analyze samples from the entire species’ distribution range.

Material and methods:
 Twenty-five genomic G-SSRs and eleven EST-SSRs from multiple species were amplified in thirty N. affinis genotypes. Polymorphism, discrimination power and possible deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were assessed.

Main results:
 Seventeen highly polymorphic G-SSRs were successfully transferred to N. affinis, with a PIC (polymorphic information content) average value of 0.811 and a He (expected heterozygosity) average value of 0.694; thirteen were validated, showing very low frequencies of null alleles and no linkage disequilibrium. Additionally, seven polymorphic EST-SSRs were transferred. As expected, PIC and He average values were low. Six out of seven markers were validated, and very low frequencies of null alleles and no linkage disequilibrium were observed.

Research highlights:
 This work provides information on the levels of microsatellites’ cross transferability to N. affinis, and its polymorphism degree. Two sets of polymorphic SSRs (genomic and expressed) to study the genetic status of the species are proposed.

Additional key words: 
microsatellites; genomic markers; functional markers; markers validation; ñandubay; espinal

Abbreviations used: 
CTAB (cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide); EST-SSR (expressed sequence tag simple sequence repeats); Fis (inbreeding coefficient); G-SSR (genomic simple sequence repeats); He (expected heterozygosity); Ho (observed heterozygosity); HWE (Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium); LD (linkage disequilibrium); Na (number of alleles); NA (frequency of null alleles); Ne (number of effective alleles); PCR (polymerase chain reaction); PIC (polymorphic information content).

Received: 07  Jul  2023. Accepted: 15  Nov  2023. Published: 21  Dec  2023

Citation: Soldati, MC; Gavier-Pizarro, G; Morales, M; Pomponio MF; Zelener, N (2024). Cross species transferability of G-SSR and EST-SSR markers to Neltuma affinis Forest Systems, Volume 33, Issue 1, eSC01. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2024331-20587

CONTENT

Introduction

 

Molecular genetics provides several tools to study genetic diversity of tree species, their response to landscape fragmentation and their adaptation to changing environments (Neophytou et al., 2022Neophytou C, Heer K, Milesi P, Peter M, Pyhäjärvi T, Westergren M, et al., 2022. Genomics and adaptation in forest ecosystems. Tree Genet Genom 18: 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-022-01542-1). Among the molecular tools available, microsatellites or SSRs stand out for their wide distribution in eukaryote genomes in both coding and non-coding regions, as well as nuclear and organellar DNA. Microsatellites are a type of DNA sequence consisting of tandem repeats of 1 to 6 nucleotide motifs and are characterized by a low degree of repetition per marker (5 to 100) and a random distribution per genome (104-105) (Wu et al., 2020Wu Y, He R, Lu Y, Zhang Z, Yang L, Guan X, et al., 2020. Development and evaluation of EST-SSR markers in Sorbus pohuashanensis and their application to other Sorbus species. Trees 34: 455-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-019-01928-0). These markers exhibit codominant inheritance, hypervariability, extensive genome coverage and can be transferred among phylogenetically close species (Wu et al., 2020Wu Y, He R, Lu Y, Zhang Z, Yang L, Guan X, et al., 2020. Development and evaluation of EST-SSR markers in Sorbus pohuashanensis and their application to other Sorbus species. Trees 34: 455-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-019-01928-0). Additionally, are widely used for population genetic, as well as genetic diversity studies (Vinson et al., 2018Vinson CC, Mangaravite E, Sebbenn AM, Lander TA, 2018. Using molecular markers to investigate genetic diversity, mating system and gene flow of Neotropical trees. Brazil J Bot 41: 481-496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40415-018-0472-x).

SSRs can be categorized as G-SSRs, when obtained from a whole genome, and as EST-SSRs, when obtained from transcribed regions and consequently related to gene function (Ouyang et al., 2018Ouyang P, Kang D, Mo X, Tian E, Hu Y, Huang R, 2018. Development and characterization of high-throughput EST-based SSR markers for Pogostemon cablin using transcriptome sequencing. Molecules 23(8): 2014. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23082014). The development of markers based on transcriptome information has been effectively applied in numerous tree species, including several Neltuma species (Torales et al., 2013Torales SL, Rivarola M, Pomponio MF, Gonzalez S, Acuña CV, Fernández P, et al., 2013. De novo assembly and characterization of leaf transcriptome for the development of functional molecular markers of the extremophile multipurpose tree species Prosopis alba. BMC Genom 14: 705. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-705; George et al., 2017George S, Manoharan D, Lib J, Britton M, Parida A, 2017. Transcriptomic responses to drought and salt stress in desert tree Prosopis juliflora. Plant Gene 12: 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plgene.2017.09.004).

Recently, the traditional Prosopis genus has been split based on strong phylogenetic evidence (Hughes et al., 2022Hughes C, Ringelberg J, Lewis G, Catalano S, 2022. Disintegration of the genus Prosopis L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade). PhytoKeys 205: 147-189. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.205.75379). Maintaining the unity of Prosopis sensu Burkart (1976)Burkart A, 1976. A monograph of the genus Prosopis (Leguminosae subfam. Mimosoideae). Arnold Arboretum 57 (3): 219-249. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.185864 is no longer sustainable. Most representatives of this genus in the New World are now located in the resurrected genus Neltuma (Hughes et al., 2022Hughes C, Ringelberg J, Lewis G, Catalano S, 2022. Disintegration of the genus Prosopis L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade). PhytoKeys 205: 147-189. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.205.75379). Neltuma affinis (Spreng.) C. Hughes et Lewis (= Prosopis affinis Spreng.; Fabaceae; Caesalpinioideae; Mimosoideae clade) (Hughes et al., 2022Hughes C, Ringelberg J, Lewis G, Catalano S, 2022. Disintegration of the genus Prosopis L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade). PhytoKeys 205: 147-189. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.205.75379), also known as ñandubay, it’s a tree species distributed in north and central-western Argentina, southern Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay (Oyarzabal et al., 2018Oyarzabal M, Clavijo J, Oakley L, Biganzoli F, Tognetti P, Barberis I, et al., 2018. Unidades de vegetación de la Argentina. Ecología Austral 28: 40-63. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.18.28.1.0.399). This species has Chacoan lineage (Morales et al., 2019Morales M, Oakley L, Sartori A, Mogni V, Atahuachi M, Vanni RO, et al., 2019. Diversity and conservation of legumes in the Gran Chaco and biogeograpical inferences. PLoS ONE 14(8): e0220151. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220151) and is one of the dominant species in some forests of the Espinal ecoregion, configuring an exclusive biogeographic district with epicenter in the province of Entre Ríos, in Argentina (Cabrera, 1976Cabrera AL, 1976. Regiones fitogeográficas argentinas. Enciclopedia Argentina Agrícola y de Jardín 2(1): 1-85.). It is severely exploited by local communities due to medicinal and chemical properties and as a source of fodder, fuel, shade, food and wood. In the present, only small relicts of the species remain immersed in a heterogeneous mosaic of crops, pasture, forest plantations, grazing and urban areas (Sabattini et al., 2016Sabattini R, Sione S, Ledesma S, Sabattini J, Wilson M, 2016. Estimación de la pérdida de superficie de bosques nativos y tasa de deforestación en la cuenca del arroyo estacas (Entre Ríos, Argentina). Revista Científica Agropecuaria 20(1-2): 45-56.).

Despite the economic value and threat condition of N. affinis, there are currently no molecular tools available to study this species. Therefore, microsatellites could provide a helpful tool to assess this species. These markers are still actively used due to its numerous advantages, including its transferability among species of the same genus or even among different genera (Ferreira-Ramos et al., 2014Ferreira-Ramos R, Guerrieri Accoroni KA, Rossi A, Corbo M, Mestriner M, Martinez CA, et al., 2014. Genetic diversity assessment for Eugenia uniflora L., E. pyriformis Cambess., E. brasiliensis Lam. and E. francavilleana O. Berg neotropical tree species (Myrtaceae) with heterologous SSR markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 61: 267-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-013-0028-7; Karci, 2023Karcı H, 2023. Development of novel genic SSR markers and their transferability across the genus Pistacia species and comparison of in silico genomic SSRs and genic SSRs in pistachio. Plant Mol Biol Rep 41: 726-735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-023-01409-2). Additionally, EST-SSRs are present in more conserved regions and, therefore, exhibit high transferability rates (Wu et al., 2020Wu Y, He R, Lu Y, Zhang Z, Yang L, Guan X, et al., 2020. Development and evaluation of EST-SSR markers in Sorbus pohuashanensis and their application to other Sorbus species. Trees 34: 455-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-019-01928-0).

Since the ñandubay is a species with no genomic data, our objective was to examine the transferability to N. affinis of different G-SSR and EST-SSR markers, all developed in several Neltuma species. Our findings provide information on the levels of cross transferability of microsatellite markers among Neltuma species as well as the relative degrees of polymorphism. Two sets of polymorphic SSR (genomic and expressed) to study the genetic status of N. affinis are proposed.

Material and methods

 

We analyzed thirty N. affinis individuals, from sixteen fragments of remaining native forest from Entre Ríos (Argentina) (Fig. 1). Voucher specimens were collected and deposited in the herbarium of Instituto de Recursos Biológicos (BAB) in order to confirm their taxonomic identity (Annex [suppl](Tables S1, S2 and Annex) accompanies the paper on Forest System´s website). Total genomic DNA from dried leaves was extracted following Soldati et al. (2013)Soldati MC, Fornes L, Van Zonneveld M, Thomas E, Zelener N, 2013. An assessment of the genetic diversity of Cedrela balansae C. DC. (Meliaceae) in Northwestern Argentina by means of combined use of SSR and AFLP molecular markers. Biochem Syst Ecol 47: 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2012.10.011.

medium/medium-FS-33-01-eSC01-gf1.png
Figure 1.  Fragments of remaining native forest (16, named from A to P) where the analyzed samples were collected.

Cross species transferability of G-SSRs and EST-SSRs markers was assessed using a sample of eight N. affinis individuals to examine twenty-five G-SSRs and eleven EST-SSRs from multiple source species (Table S1 [suppl](Tables S1, S2 and Annex) accompanies the paper on Forest System´s website). To achieve a pre-selection of microsatellites we assessed transferability success, clearness of resolution patterns and polymorphism level (at least two alleles at any frequency). Different PCR conditions were tested on each primer pair to optimize the transferability (Table S2 [suppl](Tables S1, S2 and Annex) accompanies the paper on Forest System´s website), following Mottura et al. (2005)Mottura MC, Finkeldey R, Verga AR, Gailing O, 2005. Development and characterization of microsatellite markers for Prosopis chilensis and Prosopis flexuosa and cross-species amplification. Mol Ecol Notes 5: 487-489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.00965.x and Torales et al. (2013)Torales SL, Rivarola M, Pomponio MF, Gonzalez S, Acuña CV, Fernández P, et al., 2013. De novo assembly and characterization of leaf transcriptome for the development of functional molecular markers of the extremophile multipurpose tree species Prosopis alba. BMC Genom 14: 705. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-705 PCR protocols. PCR products were genotyped using a 6% standard denaturing polyacrylamide gel, silver stained following the protocol by Benbouza et al. (2006)Benbouza H, Jacquemin JM, Baudoin JP, Mergeai G, 2006. Optimization of a reliable, fast, cheap and sensitive silver staining method to detect SSR markers in polyacrilamide gels. Biot Agron Env 10(2): 77-81.. Results were classified into three categories: polymorphic (P), monomorphic (M), and non-specific (NS). In order to assess the discrimination power of each polymorphic microsatellite, the pre-selected microsatellites were evaluated through thirty individuals. Several genetic diversity parameters (Na, Ne, Ho and He) for each polymorphic locus were estimated using GenAlEx 6.503 software (Peakall & Smouse, 2012Peakall R, Smouse PE, 2012. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research - an update. Bioinformatics 28: 2537-2539. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460). PIC was estimated using Cervus 3.0.3 software (Kalinowski et al., 2007Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC, 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16: 1099-1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x). Finally, possible deviations from HWE were assessed: NA, Fis and LD were estimated using GENEPOP 4.0 (Rousset, 2008Rousset F, 2008. Genepop Version 4.0: a complete reimplementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8: 103-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x) software. SSRs were selected according to Soldati et al. (2013)Soldati MC, Fornes L, Van Zonneveld M, Thomas E, Zelener N, 2013. An assessment of the genetic diversity of Cedrela balansae C. DC. (Meliaceae) in Northwestern Argentina by means of combined use of SSR and AFLP molecular markers. Biochem Syst Ecol 47: 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2012.10.011 criteria for these parameters.

Results and discussion

 

Two set of SSR markers (genomic and expressed) were obtained to study N. affinis. Cross transferability of SSR markers to N. affinis was 100%, with polymorphism levels ranging from 58% to 68% (EST-SSR and G-SSR, respectively). Our results agree with studies that have reported higher transferability rates for G-SSRs and EST-SSRs, when the phylogenetic distance is low (Demdoum et al., 2012Demdoum S, Muñoz F, Delgado I, Valderrabano J, Wünsch A, 2012. EST-SSR cross-amplification and genetic similarity in Onobrychis genus. Genet Resour Crop Evol 59: 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-011-9681-x). Additionally, our work is similar with the literature highlighting differences between G-SSRs and EST-SSRs, particularly when the comparison is carried out within a plant species (Manco et al., 2020Manco R, Chiaiese P, Basile B, Corrado G, 2020. Comparative analysis of genomic and ESTSSRs in European plum (Prunus domestica L.): implications for the diversity analysis of polyploids. 3 Biotech 10: 543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02513-w).

All G-SSRs assessed showed successful amplification in N. affinis: seventeen were polymorphic (68%), one was monomorphic (4%) and seven loci (28%) showed non-specific amplification (Table S1 [suppl](Tables S1, S2 and Annex) accompanies the paper on Forest System´s website). Additionally, all polymorphic markers produced fragments within the expected size range (≤ 100 bp larger or smaller than the original sequences, according to the Arnold et al. (2002)Arnold C, Rosetto M, McNally J, Henry R, 2002. The application of SSRs characterized for grape (Vitis vinifera) to conservation studies in Vitaceae. Am J Bot 89(1): 22-28. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.1.22 criteria; see Table S2 [suppl](Tables S1, S2 and Annex) accompanies the paper on Forest System´s website. Our findings agree with studies showing higher success rates on cross-genera microsatellites transferability than cross-family microsatellites transferability (Contreras et al., 2019Contreras A, Licea-Moreno RJ, Campos V, Quintana J, Merino I, Gomez L, 2019. New set of microsatellite markers for the walnut hybrid progeny Mj209xRa and assessment of its transferability into Junglans genus. Forest Syst 28(2): e009. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2019282-14776). This is particularly clear when analyzing the results of polymorphic markers, where those that were developed for phylogenetically closer species showed a higher success. A clear decrease in the percentage of polymorphic loci was particularly observed for Neltuma ruscifolia markers; this result is probably related to the phylogenetic distance between N. affinis and N. ruscifolia supporting our conclusions of higher success with lower phylogenetic distance (Catalano et al., 2008Catalano SA, Vilardi JC, Tosto D, Saidman BO, 2008. Molecular phylogeny and diversification history of Prosopis (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae). Biol J Linnean Soc 93: 621-640. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00907.x).

In N. affinis, 149 alleles were detected (average = 8.76) ranging from 4 to 18 for loci Mo08 and PRB04. The He and PIC values ranged from 0.214 to 0.906 and from 0.523 to 0.938 for loci GL18 and PRB04, respectively. Average values for those parameters were 0.694 and 0.811, demonstrating the presence of highly polymorphic markers for N. affinis (Table 1). Botstein et al. (1980)Botstein D, White RL, Skolnik M, Davis RW, 1980. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using RFLP. Am J Hum Gen 32: 314-331. proposed that microsatellites with PIC values greater than 0.5 are considered highly informative, which supports these results. Moreover, these genetic diversity parameters estimated for N. affinis were comparable and higher that those reported for Neltuma alba and Neltuma chilensis using the same microsatellite sequences (Bessega et al., 2013Bessega CF, Pometti CL, Miller JT, Watts R, Saidman BO, Vilardi JC, 2013. New microsatellite loci for Prosopis alba and P. chilensis (Fabaceae). Appl Plant Sci 1(5): 1200324. https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1200324).

Table 1.  Microsatellite characterization in Neltuma affinis (= Prosopis affinis)
Na Ne Ho He PIC NA DL Fis
G-SSRs
GL08 13 6.070 0.902 0.835 0.877 0.001 0.353 -0.044
GL12 6 3.634 0.483 0.721 0.817 0.050 0.362 0.036
GL15 10 2.304 0.652 0.565 0.682 0.024 0.316 -0.012
GL16 10 5.863 0.321 0.829 0.909 0.030 0.101 0.063
GL18 6 1.272 0.232 0.214 0.523 0.001 0.216 -0.052
GL21 10 6.184 0.726 0.836 0.891 0.041 0.149 0.017
GL23 7 4.091 0.551 0.755 0.881 0.033 0.221 0.032
GL24 9 5.294 0.695 0.808 0.882 0.046 0.215 0.018
Mo05 7 3.131 0.067 0.671 0.842 0.409 0.077 0.907
Mo07 9 3.791 0.358 0.736 0.851 0.401 0.060 0.541
Mo08 4 1.382 0.310 0.276 0.565 0.001 0.292 -0.088
Mo13 5 3.349 0.271 0.696 0.831 0.275 0.051 0.610
PRB01 10 4.005 0.625 0.748 0.849 0.047 0.199 0.018
PRB04 18 10.669 0.964 0.906 0.938 0.000 0.241 -0.032
PRB05 9 3.807 0.528 0.733 0.798 0.042 0.730 0.034
PRB08 8 3.703 0.802 0.729 0.841 0.437 0.793 -0.038
PRSC02 8 3.782 0.790 0.734 0.802 0.001 0.674 -0.054
Average 8.765 4.255 0.546 0.694 0.811 0.108 0.297 0.115
sd 3.251 2.183 0.256 0.186 0.115 0.160 0.229 0.284
EST-SSRs
I-P00930d 3 1.460 0.233 0.320 0.291 0.016 0.284 0.034
I-P03211 2 1.578 0.207 0.373 0.299 0.049 0.565 0.027
I-P03325a 4 2.754 0.923 0.649 0.582 0.001 0.225 0.002
I-P03408 5 2.675 0.200 0.637 0.561 0.028 0.372 0.000
I-P06286b 8 4.532 0.786 0.794 0.756 0.049 0.375 0.001
I-P10500 4 2.203 0.433 0.555 0.501 0.016 0.433 0.000
S-P1EPIV2 4 2.859 0.001 0.162 0.103 0.521 0.304 0.204
Average 4.286 2.580 0.398 0.499 0.442 0.097 0.365 0.038
sd 1.890 1.027 0.339 0.221 0.221 0.188 0.112 0.074

Na: number of alleles; Ne: number of effective alleles; Ho: observed heterozygosity; He; expected heterozygosity; PIC: polymorphic information content; NA: frequency of null alleles; DL: linkage disequilibrium; Fis: Inbreeding coefficient.

Null alleles were found in sixteen out of seventeen polymorphic G-SSRs transferred; however, values greater than 0.05 were reached at only four loci (Mo05, Mo07, Mo13 and PRB08). These alleles are caused by mutations in the microsatellite flanking regions, resulting in erroneous PCR amplification. Higher frequencies of null alleles have been documented when transferring heterologous primers among species, as the phylogenetic distance increases (Jahnke at al., 2022Jahnke G, Smidla J, Deák T, Oláh R, Szőke BA, Nyitrainé Sárdy DA, 2022. The SSR null allele problem, and its consequences in pedigree reconstruction and population genetic studies in Viticulture. Horticulturae 8(7): 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8070658). Our results support the hypothesis that the frequency of null allele increases with the phylogenetic distance among species (Chapuis & Estoup, 2007Chapuis MP, Estoup A, 2007. Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol Biol Evol 24: 621-631. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msl191). Additionally, none of the polymorphic loci revealed significant LD (p > 0.05) and the average inbreeding coefficient showed no significant deviations from HWE genotypic proportions, except for loci Mo05, Mo07 and Mo13. For this parameter, values close to zero are expected under random mating. Considerable positive Fis values, as those shown in loci Mo05, Mo07 and Mo13, indicate a defect of heterozygosity and are associated with high frequencies of null alleles (Peyran et al., 2020Peyran C, Planes S, Tolou N, 2020. Development of 26 highly polymorphic microsatellite markers for the highly endangered fan mussel Pinna nobilis and cross-species amplification. Mol Biol Rep 47: 2551-2559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05338-1).

Additionally, all twelve assessed EST-SSRs developed for N. alba (Torales et al., 2013Torales SL, Rivarola M, Pomponio MF, Gonzalez S, Acuña CV, Fernández P, et al., 2013. De novo assembly and characterization of leaf transcriptome for the development of functional molecular markers of the extremophile multipurpose tree species Prosopis alba. BMC Genom 14: 705. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-705), showed successful amplification in N. affinis. Among the amplified loci, seven were polymorphic (58.3%) and five were monomorphic (41.7%). All polymorphic loci produced reproducible and reliable amplicon patterns within the expected size range (Arnold et al., 2002Arnold C, Rosetto M, McNally J, Henry R, 2002. The application of SSRs characterized for grape (Vitis vinifera) to conservation studies in Vitaceae. Am J Bot 89(1): 22-28. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.1.22). None of the loci showed non-specific amplification (Table S1 [suppl](Tables S1, S2 and Annex) accompanies the paper on Forest System´s website). These results, regarding global transferability and polymorphism levels, are comparable to those obtained by Pomponio et al. (2015)Pomponio MF, Acuña C, Pentreath V, Lopez Lauenstein D, Marcucci Poltri S, Torales S, 2015. Resource communication: Characterization of functional SSR markers in Prosopis alba and their transferability across Prosopis species. Forest Syst 24(2): eRC04. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2015242-07188, who assessed the transferability of this EST-SSRs to N. flexuosa, N. chilensis, Neltuma denudans and Neltuma hassleri, supporting the relation between phylogenetic distance and transference levels. EST-SSRs usually have higher transferability rates than G-SSRs, due to be obtained from transcribed, more conserved regions (Demdoum et al., 2012Demdoum S, Muñoz F, Delgado I, Valderrabano J, Wünsch A, 2012. EST-SSR cross-amplification and genetic similarity in Onobrychis genus. Genet Resour Crop Evol 59: 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-011-9681-x). This characteristic is also the cause of higher levels of monomorphism within transferred loci, as was observed in our results and those for Neltuma juliflora (Freitas et al., 2019Freitas L, Melo CAF, Gaiotto FA, Corrêa RX, 2019. SSR based genetic diversity analysis in diploid algaroba (Prosopis spp.) population. J Agr Sci 11(1): 179-190. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v11n1p179).

A total of 30 allelic variants were identified through the seven polymorphic loci, with 2 to 8 alleles per EST-SSR (average = 4.286). The He and PIC values ranged from 0.162 to 0.794 and from 0.103 to 0.756 for loci S-P1EPIV2and I-P06286b, respectively. Four out of seven makers were highly polymorphic according to Botstein et al. (1980)Botstein D, White RL, Skolnik M, Davis RW, 1980. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using RFLP. Am J Hum Gen 32: 314-331. criteria (Table 1). Our results can be explained by the conserved nature of the EST-SSRs, which limits their polymorphism (Manco et al., 2020Manco R, Chiaiese P, Basile B, Corrado G, 2020. Comparative analysis of genomic and ESTSSRs in European plum (Prunus domestica L.): implications for the diversity analysis of polyploids. 3 Biotech 10: 543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02513-w). However, it is important to note that the results here obtained for EST-SSRs are comparable with those obtained by Pomponio et al. (2015)Pomponio MF, Acuña C, Pentreath V, Lopez Lauenstein D, Marcucci Poltri S, Torales S, 2015. Resource communication: Characterization of functional SSR markers in Prosopis alba and their transferability across Prosopis species. Forest Syst 24(2): eRC04. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2015242-07188 and Freitas et al. (2019)Freitas L, Melo CAF, Gaiotto FA, Corrêa RX, 2019. SSR based genetic diversity analysis in diploid algaroba (Prosopis spp.) population. J Agr Sci 11(1): 179-190. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v11n1p179, using the same set of markers.

Null alleles were found in all seven EST-SSRs loci, but only reached frequencies greater than 0.05 for locus S-P1EPIV2. This is probably the cause of the extremely low Ho value observed for this marker (Table 1). However, EST-SSRs are expected to be less susceptible to null alleles, considering the lower mutation rates assumed in the coding portion of the genome (Kovach et al., 2010Kovach A, Wegrzyn JL, Parra G, Holt C, Bruening GE, Loopstra CA, et al., 2010. The Pinus taeda genome is characterized by diverse and highly diverged repetitive sequences. BMC Genom 11: 420. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-420), as can be observed in our results. A positive and high Fis value was estimated also for marker S-P1EPIV2, likely because of the high frequency of null alleles showed by that locus (Peyran et al., 2020Peyran C, Planes S, Tolou N, 2020. Development of 26 highly polymorphic microsatellite markers for the highly endangered fan mussel Pinna nobilis and cross-species amplification. Mol Biol Rep 47: 2551-2559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05338-1). Finally, no significant LD (p > 0.05) was observed.

Based on our results, a set of thirteen polymorphic and validated G-SSRs (GL08, GL12, GL15, GL16, GL18, GL21, GL23, GL24, Mo08, PRB01, PRB04, PRB05 and PRSC02) and a set of six polymorphic and validated EST-SSRs (I-P00930d, I-P03211, I-P03325a, I-P03408, I-P06286b and I-P10500) are proposed. The usefulness of the Neltuma microsatellites to assess genetic diversity and structure in several Neltuma and Prosopis species has been widely documented (Bessega et al, 2021Bessega CF, Pometti CL, Fortunato R, Greene F, Santoro CM, McRostie V, 2021. Genetic studies of various Prosopis species (Leguminosae, Section Algarobia) co-occurring in oases of the Atacama Desert (northern Chile). Ecol Evol 00: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7212). Therefore, markers here proposed are valuable tools for several genetic analyses in N. affinis and could be implemented in studies of genetic diversity and structure, genetic relationships and functional genomics. Both sets of microsatellites will help to better understand genetic erosion processes by overexploitation and/or habitat anthropization and to guide appropriate management and conservation plans for N. affinis.

Supplementary material

 

(Tables S1, S2 and Annex) accompanies the paper on Forest System´s website

Data availability

 

Not applicable

Competing interests

 

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Authors’ contributions

 

María C. Soldati: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Visualization, Writing - original draft. Gregorio Gavier-Pizarro: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing - review & editing. Matías Morales: Investigation, Writing - review & editing. María F. Pomponio: Investigation, Writing - review & editing. Noga Zelener: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing - review & editing

Funding agencies/institutions: Project / Grant
INTA PE I038, PE I114 and Postgraduate Training Program

References

 

Alves FM, Zucchi MI, Azevedo-Tozzi AMG, Sartori ALB, Souza AP, 2014. Characterization of microsatellite markers developed from Prosopis rubriflora and Prosopis ruscifolia (Leguminosae - Mimosoideae), legume species that are used as models for genetic diversity studies in Chaquenian areas under anthropization in South America. BMC Research Notes 7: 375. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-375

Arnold C, Rosetto M, McNally J, Henry R, 2002. The application of SSRs characterized for grape (Vitis vinifera) to conservation studies in Vitaceae. Am J Bot 89(1): 22-28. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.1.22

Benbouza H, Jacquemin JM, Baudoin JP, Mergeai G, 2006. Optimization of a reliable, fast, cheap and sensitive silver staining method to detect SSR markers in polyacrilamide gels. Biot Agron Env 10(2): 77-81.

Bessega CF, Pometti CL, Miller JT, Watts R, Saidman BO, Vilardi JC, 2013. New microsatellite loci for Prosopis alba and P. chilensis (Fabaceae). Appl Plant Sci 1(5): 1200324. https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1200324

Bessega CF, Pometti CL, Fortunato R, Greene F, Santoro CM, McRostie V, 2021. Genetic studies of various Prosopis species (Leguminosae, Section Algarobia) co-occurring in oases of the Atacama Desert (northern Chile). Ecol Evol 00: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7212

Botstein D, White RL, Skolnik M, Davis RW, 1980. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using RFLP. Am J Hum Gen 32: 314-331.

Burkart A, 1976. A monograph of the genus Prosopis (Leguminosae subfam. Mimosoideae). Arnold Arboretum 57 (3): 219-249. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.185864

Cabrera AL, 1976. Regiones fitogeográficas argentinas. Enciclopedia Argentina Agrícola y de Jardín 2(1): 1-85.

Catalano SA, Vilardi JC, Tosto D, Saidman BO, 2008. Molecular phylogeny and diversification history of Prosopis (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae). Biol J Linnean Soc 93: 621-640. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00907.x

Chapuis MP, Estoup A, 2007. Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol Biol Evol 24: 621-631. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msl191

Contreras A, Licea-Moreno RJ, Campos V, Quintana J, Merino I, Gomez L, 2019. New set of microsatellite markers for the walnut hybrid progeny Mj209xRa and assessment of its transferability into Junglans genus. Forest Syst 28(2): e009. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2019282-14776

Demdoum S, Muñoz F, Delgado I, Valderrabano J, Wünsch A, 2012. EST-SSR cross-amplification and genetic similarity in Onobrychis genus. Genet Resour Crop Evol 59: 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-011-9681-x

Ferreira-Ramos R, Guerrieri Accoroni KA, Rossi A, Corbo M, Mestriner M, Martinez CA, et al., 2014. Genetic diversity assessment for Eugenia uniflora L., E. pyriformis Cambess., E. brasiliensis Lam. and E. francavilleana O. Berg neotropical tree species (Myrtaceae) with heterologous SSR markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 61: 267-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-013-0028-7

Freitas L, Melo CAF, Gaiotto FA, Corrêa RX, 2019. SSR based genetic diversity analysis in diploid algaroba (Prosopis spp.) population. J Agr Sci 11(1): 179-190. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v11n1p179

George S, Manoharan D, Lib J, Britton M, Parida A, 2017. Transcriptomic responses to drought and salt stress in desert tree Prosopis juliflora. Plant Gene 12: 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plgene.2017.09.004

Hughes C, Ringelberg J, Lewis G, Catalano S, 2022. Disintegration of the genus Prosopis L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade). PhytoKeys 205: 147-189. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.205.75379

Jahnke G, Smidla J, Deák T, Oláh R, Szőke BA, Nyitrainé Sárdy DA, 2022. The SSR null allele problem, and its consequences in pedigree reconstruction and population genetic studies in Viticulture. Horticulturae 8(7): 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8070658

Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC, 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16: 1099-1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x

Karcı H, 2023. Development of novel genic SSR markers and their transferability across the genus Pistacia species and comparison of in silico genomic SSRs and genic SSRs in pistachio. Plant Mol Biol Rep 41: 726-735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-023-01409-2

Kovach A, Wegrzyn JL, Parra G, Holt C, Bruening GE, Loopstra CA, et al., 2010. The Pinus taeda genome is characterized by diverse and highly diverged repetitive sequences. BMC Genom 11: 420. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-420

Manco R, Chiaiese P, Basile B, Corrado G, 2020. Comparative analysis of genomic and ESTSSRs in European plum (Prunus domestica L.): implications for the diversity analysis of polyploids. 3 Biotech 10: 543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02513-w

Morales M, Oakley L, Sartori A, Mogni V, Atahuachi M, Vanni RO, et al., 2019. Diversity and conservation of legumes in the Gran Chaco and biogeograpical inferences. PLoS ONE 14(8): e0220151. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220151

Mottura MC, Finkeldey R, Verga AR, Gailing O, 2005. Development and characterization of microsatellite markers for Prosopis chilensis and Prosopis flexuosa and cross-species amplification. Mol Ecol Notes 5: 487-489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.00965.x

Neophytou C, Heer K, Milesi P, Peter M, Pyhäjärvi T, Westergren M, et al., 2022. Genomics and adaptation in forest ecosystems. Tree Genet Genom 18: 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-022-01542-1

Ouyang P, Kang D, Mo X, Tian E, Hu Y, Huang R, 2018. Development and characterization of high-throughput EST-based SSR markers for Pogostemon cablin using transcriptome sequencing. Molecules 23(8): 2014. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23082014

Oyarzabal M, Clavijo J, Oakley L, Biganzoli F, Tognetti P, Barberis I, et al., 2018. Unidades de vegetación de la Argentina. Ecología Austral 28: 40-63. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.18.28.1.0.399

Peakall R, Smouse PE, 2012. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research - an update. Bioinformatics 28: 2537-2539. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460

Peyran C, Planes S, Tolou N, 2020. Development of 26 highly polymorphic microsatellite markers for the highly endangered fan mussel Pinna nobilis and cross-species amplification. Mol Biol Rep 47: 2551-2559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05338-1

Pomponio MF, Acuña C, Pentreath V, Lopez Lauenstein D, Marcucci Poltri S, Torales S, 2015. Resource communication: Characterization of functional SSR markers in Prosopis alba and their transferability across Prosopis species. Forest Syst 24(2): eRC04. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2015242-07188

Rousset F, 2008. Genepop Version 4.0: a complete reimplementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8: 103-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x

Sabattini R, Sione S, Ledesma S, Sabattini J, Wilson M, 2016. Estimación de la pérdida de superficie de bosques nativos y tasa de deforestación en la cuenca del arroyo estacas (Entre Ríos, Argentina). Revista Científica Agropecuaria 20(1-2): 45-56.

Soldati MC, Fornes L, Van Zonneveld M, Thomas E, Zelener N, 2013. An assessment of the genetic diversity of Cedrela balansae C. DC. (Meliaceae) in Northwestern Argentina by means of combined use of SSR and AFLP molecular markers. Biochem Syst Ecol 47: 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2012.10.011

Torales SL, Rivarola M, Pomponio MF, Gonzalez S, Acuña CV, Fernández P, et al., 2013. De novo assembly and characterization of leaf transcriptome for the development of functional molecular markers of the extremophile multipurpose tree species Prosopis alba. BMC Genom 14: 705. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-705

Vinson CC, Mangaravite E, Sebbenn AM, Lander TA, 2018. Using molecular markers to investigate genetic diversity, mating system and gene flow of Neotropical trees. Brazil J Bot 41: 481-496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40415-018-0472-x

Wu Y, He R, Lu Y, Zhang Z, Yang L, Guan X, et al., 2020. Development and evaluation of EST-SSR markers in Sorbus pohuashanensis and their application to other Sorbus species. Trees 34: 455-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-019-01928-0