Introduction Top
Cistus heterophyllus subsp. carthaginensis M.B. Crespo & Mateo (Cartagena’s rockrose), within the family Cistaceae, is endemic to the Iberian Peninsula (Albert et al., 2011). It is listed as “Endangered” at the national level in the Spanish Catalogue of Threatened Species (Moreno, 2008). It was cited as frequent in the province of Murcia (Spain) by Jiménez Munuera (1903); however, it was later considered extinct for at least twenty years (Robledo et al., 1995), until a single specimen was discovered in 1986 in the municipality of La Pobla de Vallbona (Valencia, Spain) (Crespo & Mateo, 1988). This specimen died on February 2022 (Generalitat Valenciana, 2022). In 1993, a new population was found in Peña del Águila (Murcia, Spain) formed by nine individuals (Robledo et al., 1995). These individuals died in a wildfire in 1998, but successively new seedlings germinated and 26 new individuals developed into reproductive specimens. Finally, in 2022, a new population of 59 individuals was discovered on the island of Cabrera Gran (Balearic Islands) (Cardona & Capó, 2022).
In 2018, the subspecies was declared as “in critical situation” in Spain by the Spanish regulation (BOE, 2018), due to the existence of an “imminent risk of extinction”. Consequently, works and projects aimed at its recovery were declared of general interest.
Since the end of the 90s of the last century, numerous actions have been carried out for the conservation of this plant, mainly included in the Recovery Plan for the species in the Autonomous Community of Valencia (Generalitat Valenciana, 2015). In response to this plan, an analysis of suitability of optimal areas for the reintroduction of specimens was established. Thus, different introductions of Cistus heterophyllus subsp. carthaginensis (all from seeds from the Valencian wild specimen) were carried out in several locations of Valencia (Ferrer-Gallego et al., 2019). The reproductive plant material was obtained through a plant production program conducted over several years (Ferrer-Gallego et al., 2017, 2018).
The main threats for this species are its low number of individuals and its low genetic variability. In this sense, hybridisation with the rock-rose Cistus albidus L. affects the genetic integrity of the Iberian populations (Ferrer-Gallego & Laguna, 2012). Likewise, forest fires and habitat destruction due to infrastructure and urban expansion can also affect the survival of the taxon (Generalitat Valenciana, 2015).
A new important threat to this plant species was detected on May 2021, when several weevils were observed, in the field, feeding on leaves, flowers, buds and stems of Cistus heterophyllus subsp. carthaginensis in three introduced populations of this species in Valencia (Spain) at La Manguilla (Pobla de Vallbona), Pla de Colom (Bétera) and Tancat Forestal de Porta-Coeli (Serra) (Generalitat Valenciana, 2015). However, weevils were not observed on the natural plant in La Pobla de Vallbona (Valencia, Spain), which was about 3 km from the nearest introduced population.
In this study, we provide preliminary field and laboratory observations on feeding habits and host preferences, as well as a description of the main taxonomic characteristics of this species, including male and female genitalia, which are described here for the first time.
Material and methods Top
We performed block counts (Berducou et al., 1986, Herrero et al., 2011) of the area where Pyrenean chamois was supposed to dwell once in April (before parturition), June (after parturition), September and November (rut) during 2022. Four operators walked in the area after sunrise following a planned route using binoculars, spotting scopes, mobile phones and cameras, for a period of around 4 h. When Pyrenean chamois individuals were sighted, animals were registered in a sheet. Double counts were avoided gathering together information at the end of each survey, considering sex, age, localization, and timing. Occasional sightings were also recorded.
Date | Source | Males | Females | Kids | Yearlings | Adults | Indet. | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
February | Hunters | 2 | 15 | 17 | ||||
March | Casual | 7 | 7 | |||||
April | Count | 5 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |||
June | Casual | 4 | ||||||
July | Count | 4 | 2 | 5 | 11 | |||
August | Count | 10-12 | 10-12 | |||||
September | Count | 3 | 7* | 4 | 14 | |||
November | Count | 5 | 3 | 1 | 9 | |||
Estimate | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 18 |
Study area
The area has strong slopes of loam substrate. Forest tree cover is composed mainly by Pinus halepensis, but other species such Quercus × cerrioides, Pinus nigra or Pinus sylvestris are locally common. Medicago sativa pastures are present too. Total surface surveyed was around 1,000 ha. Other ungulates in the area were domestic sheep Ovis aries, wild boar Sus scrofa, and roe deer Capreolus capreolus. Wild boar is usually hunted in battues and roe deer in still hunts. No interference with chamois occurred during battues due to the proper behavior of hunting dogs. The entire study area is under Natura 2000 Network protection because of its Aleppo pine autochthonous forests, among other values (Code ES2410055).
The source of this subpopulation of chamois could be the nearby Sierra Ferrera (2,295 m), with a population of around 150 chamois, stable since 2000 (García-Serrano & Herrero, 2022).
Results and discussionTop
Table 1 shows the results of the survey (Fig. 2). There were sighted at least 18 chamois during the whole study period. Movements from the neighboring Sierra Ferrera could not be discarded. The subpopulational stock is very low compared to other Pyrenean subpopulation (Herrero et al., 2004), but the population structure is comparable to other forest populations (Garin & Herrero, 1997). Even habitat use and grouping are comparable to other forest dwelling populations of the species (Herrero et al., 1996, 2002). The occupied area is around 2 km2 and the density is 9 chamois km-2, moving in an altitudinal range of 600-650 m asl.
Even if this altitudinal and habitat pattern can be considered as an exception, Pyrenean chamois could inhabit forests with strong slopes below 700 m permanently. This would mean a significant increase in its distribution range surpassing the current consideration of the species as an exclusively high mountain dweller. In any case, steep slopes are a fundamental requirement for the reproduction of chamois since females need vertical areas to give birth and have their young protected from terrestrial predators when they cannot flee (Pérez-Barbería & Nores, 1994).
It has to be considered that global warming (Lovari et al., 2020), encroachment (García-Ruíz et al., 2021) and forest increase (Lasanta & Vicente-Serrano, 2007) are reducing chamois habitat and quality. The occupation of these low elevation areas can represent an alternative to their traditional habitat. This preliminary work is the first document that shows a Pyrenean chamois population living all year long for a long period under 1000 m of altitude. Additional work is needed for corroborating this potential trend and studying the variables involved in this process.
Authors’ contributionsTop
Conceptualization: J. Herrero
Data curation: J. Herrero, A. García-Serrano
Formal analysis: J. Herrero, A. García-Serrano
Funding acquisition: A. García-Serrano
Investigation: J. Herrero, Carlos Félez, Fernando Herrero, A. Machuca, B. Ponz, S. Sancho
Methodology: J. Herrero, Carlos Félez, Fernando Herrero, A. Machuca, B. Ponz, S. Sancho
Project administration: A. García-Serrano
Resources: A. García-Serrano
Software: A. García-Serrano
Supervision: J. Herrero, A. García-Serrano
Validation: J. Herrero, A. García-Serrano
Visualization: J. Herrero, A. García-Serrano
Writing – original draft: J. Herrero
Writing – review & editing:J. Herrero, A. García-Serrano
References Top
Antón A, Clemente M, Foulché K, Artazkotz R, García-Serrano A, Herrero J, 2019. International coordinated monitoring of Pyrenean chamois in its westernmost edge. Caprinae News 2019: 4.
Apollonio M, Anderson R, Putman R, 2010. European ungulates and their management in the 21st century. Cambridge University Press, UK. 618 pp.
Arnal MC, Herrero J, de la Fe C, Revilla M, Prada C, Martínez-Durán M, et al., 2013. Dynamics of an infectious keratoconjunctivitis outbreak by Mycoplasma conjunctivae on Pyrenean chamois Rupicapra p. pyrenaica. PLoS One 8: e61887. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061887
Berducou C, Besson C, Guarde moniteures du PNP, 1986. Dynamique des populations d'isards du Parc National des Pyrénées. Acta Biologica Montana 1: 153-175.
Corlatti L, Herrero J, Ferretti F, Anderwald P, García-González R, Hammer S, et al., 2022. Chamois Rupicapra spp. In: Handbook of European Mammals; Hackländer K & Zachos FE (eds.). Springer Verlag, Berlin.
García-González R, Cuartas P, 1996. Trophic utilization of a montane/subalpine forest by chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica) in the Central Pyrenees. For Ecol Manage 88(1-2): 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03805-4
García-Ruiz JM, Arnáez J, Sanjuán Y, López-Moreno JI, Nadal-Romero E, Beguería S, 2021. Landscape changes and land degradation in the subalpine belt of the Central Spanish Pyrenees. J Arid Environ 186: 104396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2020.104396
García-Serrano A, Herrero J, 2022. Pyrenean chamois monitoring in Aragon. Internal report of the Regional Government of Aragon [in Spanish].
Garin I, Herrero J, 1997. Distribution, abundance and demographic parameters of the Pyrenean chamois (Rupicapra p. pyrenaica) in Navarre, Western Pyrenees. Mammalia 61(1): 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.1997.61.1.55
González J, Herrero J, Prada C, Marco J, 2013. Changes in wild ungulates populations in Aragon, Spain between 2001 and 2010. Galemys 25: 51-57. https://doi.org/10.7325/Galemys.2013.A05
Gortázar C, Herrero J, Villafuerte R, Marco J, 2000. Historical examination of the status of large mammals in Aragon, Spain. Mammalia 64(4): 411-422. https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.2000.64.4.411
Herrero J, Garin I, García-Serrano A, García-González R, 1996. Habitat use in a Rupicapra pyrenaica pyrenaica population. For Ecol Manage 88: 25-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03806-6
Herrero J, Garin I, García-Serrano A, García-González R, Aldezabal A, 2002. Grouping patterns in a forest dwelling population of Pyrenean chamois. Pirineos 157: 89-101. https://doi.org/10.3989/pirineos.2002.v157.64
Herrero J, Escudero E, Fernández de Luco D, García-González R, 2004. El sarrio pirenaico Rupicapra p. pyrenaica: biología, patología y gestión. Publicaciones del Consejo de Protección de la Naturaleza de Aragón, Serie Investigación, 309 pp. [In Spanish and French with English abstracts].
Herrero J, García-Serrano A, Prada C, Fernández-Arberas O, 2011. Using block counts and distance sampling to estimate populations of chamois. Pirineos 166: 123-133. https://doi.org/10.3989/pirineos.2011.166006
Herrero J, Lovari S, Nores C, Toïgo C, 2020. Rupicapra pyrenaica. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020.
Lasanta T, Vicente-Serrano SM, 2007. Cambios en la cubierta vegetal en el Pirineo aragonés en los últimos 50 años. Pirineos 162: 125-154. https://doi.org/10.3989/pirineos.2007.v162.16
Lovari S, Franceschi S, Chiatante G, Fattorini L, Fattorini N, Ferretti F, 2020. Climatic changes and the fate of mountain herbivores. Climatic Change 162: 2319-2337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02801-7
Pérez-Barbería FJ, Nores C, 1994. Seasonal variation in group size of Cantabrian chamois in relation to escape terrain and food. Acta Theriologica 39(3): 295-305. https://doi.org/10.4098/AT.arch.94-33
Sampere FX, García-Martí C, López-Martín TM, Ruíz-Olmo J, López-Olvera JR, Lavín S, et al., 2023. Presencia de sarrio Rupicapra p. pyrenaica en el macizo de Montserrat (NE España). Galemys 35: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.7325/Galemys.2023.N1